[v3,1/2] cxl: Add explicit precision specifiers

Michael Ellerman mpe at ellerman.id.au
Thu Jul 16 19:59:09 AEST 2015

On Thu, 2015-11-06 at 11:27:51 UTC, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
> or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
> however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
> says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be
> printed. Even if the kernel followed C99 to the letter, I don't think
> that would be particularly useful in these cases. For consistency with
> most other format strings in the file, use an explicit precision of 16
> and add a 0x prefix.
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux at rasmusvillemoes.dk>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list