[PATCH 1/2] powerpc/kexec: Reset secondary cpu endianess before kexec
Segher Boessenkool
segher at kernel.crashing.org
Fri Jul 10 01:42:11 AEST 2015
On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 11:22:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> > I agree about using labels, but "bcl 20,31,foo" is not the same thing
> > as "bl foo". The former is a form of bl that doesn't perturb the link
> > stack and is therefore better for performance when you're not going to
> > do a matching blr later (not that performance is at all critical
> > here).
>
> If performance mattered I would have complained about the extra mfmsr. :-)
>
> I see that some other parts of the kernel are using that bcl instruction, but
> if it is actually worthwhile in those places, it'd be nice to at least stick
> it in a macro for readability...
How is that going to help? It's just idiom; replacing it with some other
idiom only means people already used to the 20,31 thing (which is quite old
by now, btw.; 74xx days) will have to learn the new thing.
Unless you can think of a nice short name that can even be made an extended
mnemonic?
Segher
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list