[RFC] powerpc, tm: Drop tm_orig_msr from thread_struct
Michael Neuling
mikey at neuling.org
Fri Jul 3 15:42:46 AEST 2015
On Mon, 2015-04-20 at 13:45 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> Currently tm_orig_msr is getting used during process context switch only.
> Then there is ckpt_regs which saves the checkpointed userspace context
> The MSR slot contained in ckpt_regs structure can be used during process
> context switch instead of tm_orig_msr, thus allowing us to drop it from
> thread_struct structure. This patch does that change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Michael Neuling <mikey at neuling.org>
Thanks!
> ---
> This issue came up in the discussion regarding ptrace interface for TM
> specific registers https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/20/100, so just wanted
> to give this a try. The basic TM tests still pass after this change.
>
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -
> arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index bf117d8..fc2a3135 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -264,7 +264,6 @@ struct thread_struct {
> u64 tm_tfhar; /* Transaction fail handler addr */
> u64 tm_texasr; /* Transaction exception & summary */
> u64 tm_tfiar; /* Transaction fail instr address reg */
> - unsigned long tm_orig_msr; /* Thread's MSR on ctx switch */
> struct pt_regs ckpt_regs; /* Checkpointed registers */
>
> unsigned long tm_tar;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> index febb50d..654830a 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ void giveup_fpu_maybe_transactional(struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (tsk == current && tsk->thread.regs &&
> MSR_TM_ACTIVE(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
> !test_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_TM)) {
> - tsk->thread.tm_orig_msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
> + tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
> set_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_TM);
> }
>
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void giveup_altivec_maybe_transactional(struct task_struct *tsk)
> if (tsk == current && tsk->thread.regs &&
> MSR_TM_ACTIVE(tsk->thread.regs->msr) &&
> !test_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_TM)) {
> - tsk->thread.tm_orig_msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
> + tsk->thread.ckpt_regs.msr = tsk->thread.regs->msr;
> set_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_TM);
> }
>
> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static void tm_reclaim_thread(struct thread_struct *thr,
> * the thread will no longer be transactional.
> */
> if (test_ti_thread_flag(ti, TIF_RESTORE_TM)) {
> - msr_diff = thr->tm_orig_msr & ~thr->regs->msr;
> + msr_diff = thr->ckpt_regs.msr & ~thr->regs->msr;
> if (msr_diff & MSR_FP)
> memcpy(&thr->transact_fp, &thr->fp_state,
> sizeof(struct thread_fp_state));
> @@ -594,10 +594,10 @@ static inline void tm_reclaim_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> /* Stash the original thread MSR, as giveup_fpu et al will
> * modify it. We hold onto it to see whether the task used
> * FP & vector regs. If the TIF_RESTORE_TM flag is set,
> - * tm_orig_msr is already set.
> + * ckpt_regs.msr is already set.
> */
> if (!test_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(tsk), TIF_RESTORE_TM))
> - thr->tm_orig_msr = thr->regs->msr;
> + thr->ckpt_regs.msr = thr->regs->msr;
>
> TM_DEBUG("--- tm_reclaim on pid %d (NIP=%lx, "
> "ccr=%lx, msr=%lx, trap=%lx)\n",
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static inline void tm_recheckpoint_new_task(struct task_struct *new)
> tm_restore_sprs(&new->thread);
> return;
> }
> - msr = new->thread.tm_orig_msr;
> + msr = new->thread.ckpt_regs.msr;
> /* Recheckpoint to restore original checkpointed register state. */
> TM_DEBUG("*** tm_recheckpoint of pid %d "
> "(new->msr 0x%lx, new->origmsr 0x%lx)\n",
> @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ void restore_tm_state(struct pt_regs *regs)
> if (!MSR_TM_ACTIVE(regs->msr))
> return;
>
> - msr_diff = current->thread.tm_orig_msr & ~regs->msr;
> + msr_diff = current->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & ~regs->msr;
> msr_diff &= MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX;
> if (msr_diff & MSR_FP) {
> fp_enable();
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list