[PATCH V2] cpuidle/powernv: Read target_residency value of idle states from DT if available
Preeti U Murthy
preeti at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jan 28 20:50:30 AEDT 2015
On 01/28/2015 02:45 PM, Stewart Smith wrote:
> Preeti U Murthy <preeti at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> The device tree now exposes the residency values for different idle states. Read
>> these values instead of calculating residency from the latency values. The values
>> exposed in the DT are validated for optimal power efficiency. However to maintain
>> compatibility with the older firmware code which does not expose residency
>> values, use default values as a fallback mechanism. While at it, handle some
>> cleanups.
>
> From a "I just merged the patch that exports these values from firmware"
> point of view, using them and falling back looks good.
>
> (I find the hardcoding of snooze in the driver a bit odd, as is the
Snooze is the only software defined idle state, the rest are platform
specific. The first idle state is usually associated with some sort of a
polling operation and each architecture has a variant to this. This is
why we end up hard-coding this idle state in the driver as far as my
understanding goes.
> hardcoding of max power states to 8 - which could bite us in the future
Hmm.. not sure about this. Need to check.
> if a future processor has more states... but these aren't problems with
> this patch)
>
> Acked-by: Stewart Smith <stewart at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks!
Regards
Preeti U Murthy
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list