powernv/opal-irqchip: Fix double endian conversion
Alistair Popple
alistair at popple.id.au
Tue Dec 8 09:39:05 AEDT 2015
On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:10:19 Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Subject should start "powerpc/", so probably "powerpc/opal-irqchip:", I can fix
> it up here.
Ok, thanks.
> On Mon, 2015-07-12 at 00:28:28 UTC, Alistair Popple wrote:
> > The OPAL event calls return a mask of events that are active in big
> > endian format. This is checked when unmasking the events in the
> > irqchip by comparison with a cached value. The cached value was stored
> > in big endian format but should've been converted to CPU endian
> > first. This bug leads to OPAL event delivery being delayed or dropped
> > on some systems.
> >
> > The bug is fixed by calling opal_handle_events(...) instead of
> > duplicating code in opal_event_unmask(...).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alistair Popple <alistair at popple.id.au>
> > Reported-by: Douglas L Lehr <dllehr at us.ibm.com>
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>
> Which commit does it fix? Looks like:
>
> Fixes: 9f0fd0499d30 ("powerpc/powernv: Add a virtual irqchip for opal events")
Yep.
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > index 2c91ee7..a387d18 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-irqchip.c
> > @@ -43,11 +43,34 @@ static unsigned int opal_irq_count;
> > static unsigned int *opal_irqs;
> >
> > static void opal_handle_irq_work(struct irq_work *work);
> > -static __be64 last_outstanding_events;
> > +static u64 last_outstanding_events;
> > static struct irq_work opal_event_irq_work = {
> > .func = opal_handle_irq_work,
> > };
> >
> > +void opal_handle_events(uint64_t events)
> > +{
> > + int virq, hwirq = 0;
> > + u64 mask = opal_event_irqchip.mask;
> > +
> > + if (!in_irq() && (events & mask)) {
> > + last_outstanding_events = events;
> > + irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + while (events & mask) {
> > + hwirq = fls64(events) - 1;
> > + if (BIT_ULL(hwirq) & mask) {
> > + virq = irq_find_mapping(opal_event_irqchip.domain,
> > + hwirq);
> > + if (virq)
> > + generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > + }
> > + events &= ~BIT_ULL(hwirq);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So this is 100% just a move of the code from down below right?
That is correct - it should be identical.
Thanks.
- Alistair
> > @@ -55,12 +78,12 @@ static void opal_event_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> >
> > static void opal_event_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> > {
> > + __be64 events;
> > +
> > set_bit(d->hwirq, &opal_event_irqchip.mask);
> >
> > - opal_poll_events(&last_outstanding_events);
> > - if (last_outstanding_events & opal_event_irqchip.mask)
> > - /* Need to retrigger the interrupt */
> > - irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > + opal_poll_events(&events);
> > + opal_handle_events(be64_to_cpu(events));
> > }
> >
> > static int opal_event_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
> > @@ -96,29 +119,6 @@ static int opal_event_map(struct irq_domain *d, unsigned int irq,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -void opal_handle_events(uint64_t events)
> > -{
> > - int virq, hwirq = 0;
> > - u64 mask = opal_event_irqchip.mask;
> > -
> > - if (!in_irq() && (events & mask)) {
> > - last_outstanding_events = events;
> > - irq_work_queue(&opal_event_irq_work);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > - while (events & mask) {
> > - hwirq = fls64(events) - 1;
> > - if (BIT_ULL(hwirq) & mask) {
> > - virq = irq_find_mapping(opal_event_irqchip.domain,
> > - hwirq);
> > - if (virq)
> > - generic_handle_irq(virq);
> > - }
> > - events &= ~BIT_ULL(hwirq);
> > - }
> > -}
> > -
> > static irqreturn_t opal_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> > {
> > __be64 events;
> > @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static irqreturn_t opal_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> >
> > static void opal_handle_irq_work(struct irq_work *work)
> > {
> > - opal_handle_events(be64_to_cpu(last_outstanding_events));
> > + opal_handle_events(last_outstanding_events);
> > }
> >
> > static int opal_event_match(struct irq_domain *h, struct device_node *node,
>
>
> cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list