[PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Add test to check is DSCR is corrupted.
Michael Ellerman
mpe at ellerman.id.au
Wed Dec 2 12:59:11 AEDT 2015
Hi Rashmica,
Just a few nits ...
Your subject: selftests/powerpc: Add test to check is DSCR is corrupted.
Looks like it might want to be "if DSCR is" ?
On Wed, 2015-12-02 at 11:02 +1100, Rashmica Gupta wrote:
> If the transaction is aborted, the DSCR should be rolled back to the
> checkpointed value before the transaction began.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rashmica Gupta <rashmicy at gmail.com>
> ---
> To check this yourself, undo the changes from the patch "powerpc/tm: Fix
> context switching TAR, PPR and DSCR SPRs".
Thanks for checking that actually makes it work.
That would be worth having in the commit message too, formatted like:
28e61cc466d8 ("powerpc/tm: Fix context switching TAR, PPR and DSCR SPRs")
> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/.gitignore | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/Makefile | 2 +-
> tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-dscr.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-dscr.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/.gitignore
> index d0c7c97e9b13..76eae258feeb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/.gitignore
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/.gitignore
> @@ -3,3 +3,4 @@ tm-syscall
> tm-signal-msr-resv
> tm-signal-stack
> tm-fork
> +tm-dscr
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/Makefile
> index f7d4727662aa..59eec240339d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -TEST_PROGS := tm-resched-dscr tm-syscall tm-signal-msr-resv tm-signal-stack tm-fork
> +TEST_PROGS := tm-resched-dscr tm-syscall tm-signal-msr-resv tm-signal-stack tm-fork tm-dscr
It's probably time to wrap that line.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-dscr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-dscr.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ac44e259c86d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-dscr.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
> +/*
> + * Copyright 2015, Michael Neuling, IBM Corp.
> + * Licensed under GPLv2.
> + * Original: Michael Neuling 19/7/2013
> + * Edited: Rashmica Gupta 01/12/2015
This should probably just be:
> + * Copyright 2013-2015, Michael Neuling, Rashmica Gupta, IBM Corp.
> + *
> + * Licensed under GPLv2.
> + *
> + * Do some transactions, see if the dscr is corrupted.
> + *
Spare blank line there.
> + */
> +
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <unistd.h>
> +#include <string.h>
> +
> +#include "tm.h"
> +#include "utils.h"
> +
> +#define SPRN_DSCR 0x3
> +
> +int num_loops = 10000;
Don't use tabs there please.
And num_loops can be static.
> +int test_dscr(void)
Can be static.
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + SKIP_IF(!have_htm());
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_loops; i++)
> + {
> + uint64_t result = 0;
> + asm __volatile__(
> + "li 7, 1;"
> + "mtspr %[dscr], 7;" // dscr = 1
> + "tbegin.;"
> + "beq 3f ;"
> + "li 4, 0x7000;" // Loop lots, to use time
> + "2: ;" // Start loop
> + "li 7, 2;"
> + "mtspr %[dscr], 7;" // dscr = 2
> + "tsuspend.;"
> + "li 7, 3;"
> + "mtspr %[dscr], 7;" // dscr = 3
> + "tresume.;"
> + "subi 4, 4, 1;"
> + "cmpdi 4, 0;"
> + "bne 2b;"
> + "tend.;"
> +
> + // Transaction sucess! DSCR should be 3.
> + "mfspr 7, %[dscr];"
> + "ori %[res], 7, 4;" // res = 3|4 = 7
> + "b 4f;"
> +
> + // Abort handler. DSCR should be rolled back to 1.
> + "3:;"
> + "mfspr 7, %[dscr];"
You have a bunch of trailing whitespace above which woule be nice to clean up.
> + "ori %[res], 7, 8;" // res = 1|8 = 9
> + "4:;"
> +
> + : [res]"=r"(result)
> + : [dscr]"i"(SPRN_DSCR)
> + : "memory", "r0", "r4", "r7");
> +
> + // If result is anything else other than 7 or 9, the dscr
> + // value must have been corrupted.
Please use /* .. */ style comments for multi-line comments.
> + if ((result != 7) && (result != 9))
> + return 1;
> +
> + }
You have a spare blank line there before the }.
But you need one here after the }.
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> +{
> +
Spare blank line.
> + // A low number of iterations (eg 100) can cause a false pass.
> + if (argc > 1) {
> + if (strcmp(argv[1], "-h") == 0) {
> + printf("Syntax:\n\t%s [<num loops>]\n",
> + argv[0]);
This would usually be:
Usage: tm-dscr [num loops]
I wouldn't bother using argv[0].
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + num_loops = atoi(argv[1]);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + printf("Starting, %d loops\n", num_loops);
> +
> + test_harness(test_dscr, "tm_dscr");
The test name should probably be the same as the binary, ie. "tm-dscr".
> +}
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list