[PATCH V2 3/6] powerpc/powernv: use one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for one VF BAR
Wei Yang
weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Aug 10 11:48:15 AEST 2015
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 06:59:58PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>On 08/07/2015 12:01 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 08:04:58PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>>On 08/05/2015 11:25 AM, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>>In current implementation, when VF BAR is bigger than 64MB, it uses 4 M64
>>>>BAR in Single PE mode to cover the number of VFs required to be enabled.
>>>>By doing so, several VFs would be in one VF Group and leads to interference
>>>>between VFs in the same group.
>>>>
>>>>This patch changes the design by using one M64 BAR in Single PE mode for
>>>>one VF BAR. This gives absolute isolation for VFs.
>>>>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <weiyang at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>---
>>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 5 +-
>>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 180 ++++++++++++-----------------
>>>> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>index 712add5..8aeba4c 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
>>>>@@ -214,10 +214,9 @@ struct pci_dn {
>>>> u16 vfs_expanded; /* number of VFs IOV BAR expanded */
>>>> u16 num_vfs; /* number of VFs enabled*/
>>>> int offset; /* PE# for the first VF PE */
>>>>-#define M64_PER_IOV 4
>>>>- int m64_per_iov;
>>>>+ bool m64_single_mode; /* Use M64 BAR in Single Mode */
>>>> #define IODA_INVALID_M64 (-1)
>>>>- int m64_wins[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS][M64_PER_IOV];
>>>>+ int (*m64_map)[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS];
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>> #endif
>>>> struct list_head child_list;
>>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>index 7192e62..f5d110c 100644
>>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
>>>>@@ -1148,29 +1148,36 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_setup_PEs(void)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_IOV
>>>>-static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>>+static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>> int i, j;
>>>>+ int m64_bars;
>>>>
>>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>> phb = hose->private_data;
>>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>>
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>>+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ m64_bars = 1;
>>>>+
>>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
>>>>- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++) {
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_wins[i][j] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
>>>>+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_map[j][i] == IODA_INVALID_M64)
>>>> continue;
>>>> opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
>>>>- clear_bit(pdn->m64_wins[i][j], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
>>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
>>>>+ clear_bit(pdn->m64_map[j][i], &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>+ kfree(pdn->m64_map);
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>@@ -1187,8 +1194,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> int total_vfs;
>>>> resource_size_t size, start;
>>>> int pe_num;
>>>>- int vf_groups;
>>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>>+ int m64_bars;
>>>>
>>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>>@@ -1196,26 +1202,26 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>> total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
>>>>
>>>>- /* Initialize the m64_wins to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
>>>>- for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++)
>>>>- for (j = 0; j < M64_PER_IOV; j++)
>>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>
>>>
>>>This is a physical function's @pdn, right?
>>
>>Yes
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>+ m64_bars = num_vfs;
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ m64_bars = 1;
>>>>+
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map = kmalloc(sizeof(*pdn->m64_map) * m64_bars, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>>
>>>Assume we have SRIOV device with 16VF.
>>>So it was m64_wins[6][4], now it is (roughly speaking) m64_map[6][16]
>>>(for a single PE mode) or m64_map[6][1]. I believe m64_bars cannot be
>>>bigger than 16 on PHB3, right? Is this checked anywhere (does it have
>>>to)?
>>
>>In pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(), we need to find_next_zero_bit() and check the
>>return value. If exceed m64_bar_idx, means fail.
>>
>>>
>>>This m64_wins -> m64_map change - is was not a map (what was it?),
>>>and it is, is not it?
>>
>>Hmm... Gavin like this name.
>>
>>>
>>>What does it store? An index of M64 BAR (0..15)?
>>>
>>
>>Yes.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_map)
>>>>+ return -ENOMEM;
>>>>+ /* Initialize the m64_map to IODA_INVALID_M64 */
>>>>+ for (i = 0; i < m64_bars ; i++)
>>>>+ for (j = 0; j < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; j++)
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map[i][j] = IODA_INVALID_M64;
>>>>
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>>- vf_groups = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV) ? num_vfs: M64_PER_IOV;
>>>>- vf_per_group = (num_vfs <= M64_PER_IOV)? 1:
>>>>- roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>>- } else {
>>>>- vf_groups = 1;
>>>>- vf_per_group = 1;
>>>>- }
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>>>> res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
>>>> if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
>>>> continue;
>>>>
>>>>- for (j = 0; j < vf_groups; j++) {
>>>>+ for (j = 0; j < m64_bars; j++) {
>>>> do {
>>>> win = find_next_zero_bit(&phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc,
>>>> phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx + 1, 0);
>>>>@@ -1224,12 +1230,11 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> goto m64_failed;
>>>> } while (test_and_set_bit(win, &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc));
>>>>
>>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j] = win;
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i] = win;
>>>>
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>>> size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev,
>>>> PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i);
>>>>- size = size * vf_per_group;
>>>> start = res->start + size * j;
>>>> } else {
>>>> size = resource_size(res);
>>>>@@ -1237,16 +1242,16 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Map the M64 here */
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>>> pe_num = pdn->offset + j;
>>>> rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>> pe_num, OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 0);
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i], 0);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
>>>> OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
>>>>- pdn->m64_wins[i][j],
>>>>+ pdn->m64_map[j][i],
>>>> start,
>>>> 0, /* unused */
>>>> size);
>>>>@@ -1258,12 +1263,12 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> goto m64_failed;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV)
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>> rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 2);
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 2);
>>>> else
>>>> rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_wins[i][j], 1);
>>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, pdn->m64_map[j][i], 1);
>>>>
>>>> if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable M64 window #%d: %llx\n",
>>>>@@ -1275,7 +1280,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> return 0;
>>>>
>>>> m64_failed:
>>>>- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
>>>>+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>> return -EBUSY;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>@@ -1302,15 +1307,13 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda2_release_dma_pe(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pnv_ioda_pe
>>>> iommu_free_table(tbl, of_node_full_name(dev->dev.of_node));
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>-static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>>+static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> {
>>>> struct pci_bus *bus;
>>>> struct pci_controller *hose;
>>>> struct pnv_phb *phb;
>>>> struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *pe_n;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>>- u16 vf_index;
>>>>- int64_t rc;
>>>>
>>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>>@@ -1320,35 +1323,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> if (!pdev->is_physfn)
>>>> return;
>>>>
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>>- int vf_group;
>>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>>- int vf_index1;
>>>>-
>>>>- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>>-
>>>>- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++)
>>>>- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>>- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>>- vf_index < num_vfs;
>>>>- vf_index++)
>>>>- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>>- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>>- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
>>>>- vf_index1++){
>>>>-
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
>>>>- OPAL_REMOVE_PE_FROM_DOMAIN);
>>>>-
>>>>- if (rc)
>>>>- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to unlink same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
>>>>- __func__,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>-
>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(pe, pe_n, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
>>>> if (pe->parent_dev != pdev)
>>>> continue;
>>>>@@ -1383,14 +1357,14 @@ void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> num_vfs = pdn->num_vfs;
>>>>
>>>> /* Release VF PEs */
>>>>- pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>>+ pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev);
>>>>
>>>> if (phb->type == PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1)
>>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>> pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -pdn->offset);
>>>>
>>>> /* Release M64 windows */
>>>>- pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev);
>>>>+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>>
>>>> /* Release PE numbers */
>>>> bitmap_clear(phb->ioda.pe_alloc, pdn->offset, num_vfs);
>>>>@@ -1409,7 +1383,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> int pe_num;
>>>> u16 vf_index;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn;
>>>>- int64_t rc;
>>>>
>>>> bus = pdev->bus;
>>>> hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus);
>>>>@@ -1454,37 +1427,6 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>>
>>>> pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
>>>> }
>>>>-
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == M64_PER_IOV && num_vfs > M64_PER_IOV) {
>>>>- int vf_group;
>>>>- int vf_per_group;
>>>>- int vf_index1;
>>>>-
>>>>- vf_per_group = roundup_pow_of_two(num_vfs) / pdn->m64_per_iov;
>>>>-
>>>>- for (vf_group = 0; vf_group < M64_PER_IOV; vf_group++) {
>>>>- for (vf_index = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>>- vf_index < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>>- vf_index < num_vfs;
>>>>- vf_index++) {
>>>>- for (vf_index1 = vf_group * vf_per_group;
>>>>- vf_index1 < (vf_group + 1) * vf_per_group &&
>>>>- vf_index1 < num_vfs;
>>>>- vf_index1++) {
>>>>-
>>>>- rc = opal_pci_set_peltv(phb->opal_id,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1,
>>>>- OPAL_ADD_PE_TO_DOMAIN);
>>>>-
>>>>- if (rc)
>>>>- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "%s: Failed to link same group PE#%d(%lld)\n",
>>>>- __func__,
>>>>- pdn->offset + vf_index1, rc);
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>>- }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>>@@ -1507,6 +1449,18 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> return -EBUSY;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>+ /*
>>>>+ * On PNV_PHB_IODA2, We just have 16 M64 BARs and M64 BAR #15
>>>>+ * is used to cover the whole system, which leaves only 15 M64
>>>>+ * BAR usable for VFs.
>>>>+ * When M64 BAR functions in Single PE mode, this means it
>>>>+ * just could enable 15 VFs.
>>>>+ */
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode && num_vfs >= 16) {
>>>
>>>Magic constant 16. Where did this 16 come from? My understanding is
>>>it could come from
>>>
>>>1) hostboot or
>>>2) OPAL or
>>>3) architected on IODA2
>>>4) defined in PHB3 (actually it has to be 2))
>>>
>>>which one is it? If 1) and 2) - make it a variable; if 3) - add a macro for it.
>>>
>>
>>As Gavin indicated, this will change to "num_vfs > phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx"
>
>
>This does not really answer my question ;) But I believe it is 4) as
>PHB3 (IODA2 does not mention M64 at all) has only 16 M64's per PHB.
>
Yep, I think it is 4).
>Still, pnv_ioda_parse_m64_window() puts 15 to m64_bar_idx with no
>explanation why. If there was "#define PNV_IODA2_PHB3_M64_MAX_NUMBER
>16" somewhere OR some call to OPAL which returns this "16" on PHB3
>but there is none.
>
No place defined it.
We can leverage m64_bar_idx in this patch, and need another patch to fix this
problem as mentioned above.
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>>+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Not enough M64 BAR for VFs\n");
>>>>+ return -EBUSY;
>>>>+ }
>>>>+
>>>> /* Calculate available PE for required VFs */
>>>> mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_alloc_mutex);
>>>> pdn->offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(
>>>>@@ -1534,7 +1488,7 @@ int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> * the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs.
>>>> * Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
>>>> */
>>>>- if (pdn->m64_per_iov == 1) {
>>>>+ if (!pdn->m64_single_mode) {
>>>> ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, pdn->offset);
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> goto m64_failed;
>>>>@@ -1567,8 +1521,7 @@ int pcibios_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
>>>> /* Allocate PCI data */
>>>> add_dev_pci_data(pdev);
>>>>
>>>>- pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>>- return 0;
>>>>+ return pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
>>>> }
>>>> #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_IOV */
>>>>
>>>>@@ -2761,9 +2714,9 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>>
>>>> pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>> pdn->vfs_expanded = 0;
>>>>+ pdn->m64_single_mode = false;
>>>>
>>>> total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev);
>>>>- pdn->m64_per_iov = 1;
>>>> mul = phb->ioda.total_pe;
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
>>>>@@ -2783,8 +2736,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>>> if (size > (1 << 26)) {
>>>> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "PowerNV: VF BAR%d: %pR IOV size is bigger than 64M, roundup power2\n",
>>>> i, res);
>>>>- pdn->m64_per_iov = M64_PER_IOV;
>>>> mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs);
>>>>+ pdn->m64_single_mode = true;
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>@@ -2986,6 +2939,8 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_window_alignment(struct pci_bus *bus,
>>>> static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> int resno)
>>>> {
>>>>+ struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(pdev->bus);
>>>>+ struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
>>>> struct pci_dn *pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
>>>> resource_size_t align;
>>>>
>>>>@@ -2994,12 +2949,25 @@ static resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
>>>> * BAR should be size aligned.
>>>> *
>>>>+ * When IOV BAR is mapped with M64 BAR in Single PE mode, the hardware
>>>>+ * restriction to alignment is gone.
>>>
>>>
>>>Gone? Does not BAR still have to be aligned to its size?
>>>
>>
>>Yes, M64 BAR is always size aligned. While since in Single PE mode, the M64
>>BAR size is the same as a VF BAR size, which means they have the same
>>alignment now. What I want to say is the extra hardware restriction is gone.
>>
>>Let me put more to explain this.
>
>Sure. Just add "extra powernv-specific" before "hardware restriction"
>(or something like that).
>
>
>
>>>
>>>>But if just use the VF BAR size
>>>>+ * as the alignment, PF BAR / VF BAR may be allocated with in one M64
>>>>+ * segment,
>>>
>>>
>>>I thought each VF gets its own _segment_, am I wrong?
>>>
>>
>> From the one M64 BAR map the VF BAR, yes.
>>
>>While we have M64 BAR#15 to cover the whole 64bit MMIO space, whose segment
>>size is bigger then the one map the VF BARA. When not properly aligned, VF and
>>PF may sit in the same segment of the M64 BAR#15.
>
>
>When is M64 #15 not in a single mode? Always?
>
Always in shared mode. When we want to use the 64bit MMIO range, we need one
M64 BAR to segment it.
>
>
>>>
>>>>which introduces the PE conflict between PF and VF. Based
>>>>+ * on this the minimum alignment of an IOV BAR is m64_segsize.
>>>>
>>>>+ *
>>>> * This function return the total IOV BAR size if expanded or just the
>>>>- * individual size if not.
>>>>+ * individual size if not, when M64 BAR is in Shared PE mode.
>>>>+ * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or
>>>>+ * m64_size if IOV BAR size is less.
>>>> */
>>>> align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
>>>>- if (pdn->vfs_expanded)
>>>>- return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
>>>>+ if (pdn->vfs_expanded) {
>>>>+ if (pdn->m64_single_mode)
>>>>+ return max(align,
>>>>+ (resource_size_t)phb->ioda.m64_segsize);
>>>>+ else
>>>>+ return pdn->vfs_expanded * align;
>>>>+ }
>>>>
>>>> return align;
>>>> }
>
>
>
>--
>Alexey
--
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list