[PATCH 1/3] Powerpc: mpc85xx: refactor the PM operations
Chenhui Zhao
chenhui.zhao at freescale.com
Thu Aug 6 14:20:37 AEST 2015
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-08-05 at 18:11 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 19:32 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
>> > > >
>> >
>> > > On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:59 AM, Scott Wood
>> <scottwood at freescale.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > >
>> > > > Could you explain irq_mask()? Why would there still be IRQs
>> > > destined
>> > > > for
>> > > > this CPU at this point?
>> > >
>> > > This function just masks irq by setting the registers in RCPM
>> (for
>> > > example, RCPM_CPMIMR, RCPM_CPMCIMR). Actually, all irqs to
>> this CPU
>> > > have been migrated to other CPUs.
>> >
>> > So why do we need to set those bits in RCPM? Is it just caution?
>>
>> Setting these bits can mask interrupts signalled to RCPM from MPIC
>> as a
>> means of
>> waking up from a lower power state. So, cores will not be waked up
>> unexpectedly.
>
> Why would the MPIC be signalling those interrupts if they've been
> masked at
> the MPIC?
>
> -Scott
>
The interrupts to RCPM from MPIC are IRQ, Machine Check, NMI and
Critical interrupts. Some of them didn't be masked in MPIC.
-Chenhui
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list