[PATCH] of: return NUMA_NO_NODE from fallback of_node_to_nid()
songxiumiao at inspur.com
songxiumiao at inspur.com
Wed Apr 29 18:37:53 AEST 2015
Thanks a lot.We have added the patch into the kernel4.0-rc4 and it works.
From: Konstantin Khlebnikov
Date: 2015-04-29 16:30
To: songxiumiao at inspur.com; Rob Herring
CC: Grant Likely; devicetree at vger.kernel.org; Rob Herring; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; sparclinux at vger.kernel.org; linux-mm at kvack.org; linuxppc-dev; yanxiaofeng; x86 at kernel.org; linux-metag at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: return NUMA_NO_NODE from fallback of_node_to_nid()
+x86 at kernel.org
+linux-metag at vger.kernel.org
here is proposed fix:
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg864009.html
It returns NUMA_NO_NODE from both static-inline (CONFIG_OF=n) and weak
version of of_node_to_nid(). This change might affect few arches which
whave CONFIG_OF=y but doesn't implement of_node_to_nid() (i.e. depends
on default behavior of weak function). It seems this is only metag.
From mm/ point of view returning NUMA_NO_NODE is a right choice when
code have no idea which numa node should be used -- memory allocation
functions choose current numa node (but they might use any).
On 29.04.2015 04:11, songxiumiao at inspur.com wrote:
> When we test the cpu and memory hotplug feature in the server with x86
> architecture and kernel4.0-rc4,we met the similar problem.
>
> The situation is that when memory in node0 is offline,the system is down
> during booting.
>
> Following is the bug information:
> [ 0.335176] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at
> 0000000000001b08
> [ 0.342164] IP: [<ffffffff81182587>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xb7/0x940
> [ 0.348706] PGD 0
> [ 0.350735] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [ 0.353993] Modules linked in:
> [ 0.357063] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.0.0-rc4 #1
> [ 0.363232] Hardware name: Inspur TS860/TS860, BIOS TS860_2.0.0
> 2015/03/24
> [ 0.370095] task: ffff88085b1e0000 ti: ffff88085b1e8000 task.ti:
> ffff88085b1e8000
> [ 0.377564] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81182587>] [<ffffffff81182587>]
> __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xb7/0x940
> [ 0.386524] RSP: 0000:ffff88085b1ebac8 EFLAGS: 00010246
> [ 0.391828] RAX: 0000000000001b00 RBX: 0000000000000010 RCX:
> 0000000000000000
> [ 0.398953] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> 00000000002052d0
> [ 0.406075] RBP: ffff88085b1ebbb8 R08: ffff88085b13fec0 R09:
> 000000005b13fe01
> [ 0.413198] R10: ffff88085e807300 R11: ffffffff810d4bc1 R12:
> 000000000001002a
> [ 0.420321] R13: 00000000002052d0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15:
> 00000000000040d0
> [ 0.427446] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88085ee00000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [ 0.435522] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [ 0.441259] CR2: 0000000000001b08 CR3: 00000000019ae000 CR4:
> 00000000001406f0
> [ 0.448382] Stack:
> [ 0.450392] ffff88085b1e0000 0000000000000400 ffff88085b1effff
> ffff88085b1ebb68
> [ 0.457846] 000000000000007b ffff88085b12d140 ffff88085b249000
> 000000000000007b
> [ 0.465298] ffff88085b1ebb28 ffffffff81af2900 0000000000000000
> 002052d05b12d140
> [ 0.472750] Call Trace:
> [ 0.475206] [<ffffffff811d27b3>] ? deactivate_slab+0x383/0x400
> [ 0.481123] [<ffffffff811d3947>] new_slab+0xa7/0x460
> [ 0.486174] [<ffffffff816789e5>] __slab_alloc+0x310/0x470
> [ 0.491655] [<ffffffff8105304f>] ? dmar_msi_set_affinity+0x8f/0xc0
> [ 0.497921] [<ffffffff810d4bc1>] ? __irq_domain_add+0x41/0x100
> [ 0.503838] [<ffffffff810d0fee>] ? irq_do_set_affinity+0x5e/0x70
> [ 0.509920] [<ffffffff811d571d>] __kmalloc_node+0xad/0x2e0
> [ 0.515483] [<ffffffff810d4bc1>] ? __irq_domain_add+0x41/0x100
> [ 0.521392] [<ffffffff810d4bc1>] __irq_domain_add+0x41/0x100
> [ 0.527133] [<ffffffff8105102e>] mp_irqdomain_create+0x9e/0x120
> [ 0.533140] [<ffffffff81b2fb14>] setup_IO_APIC+0x64/0x1be
> [ 0.538622] [<ffffffff81b2e226>] apic_bsp_setup+0xa2/0xae
> [ 0.544099] [<ffffffff81b2bc70>] native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x267/0x2b2
> [ 0.550531] [<ffffffff81b1927b>] kernel_init_freeable+0xf2/0x253
> [ 0.556625] [<ffffffff8166b960>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
> [ 0.561845] [<ffffffff8166b96e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0
> [ 0.566979] [<ffffffff81681bd8>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
> [ 0.572374] [<ffffffff8166b960>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80
> [ 0.577591] Code: 30 97 00 89 45 bc 83 e1 0f b8 22 01 32 01 01 c9 d3
> f8 83 e0 03 89 9d 6c ff ff ff 83 e3 10 89 45 c0 0f 85 6d 01 00 00 48 8b
> 45 88 <48> 83 78 08 00 0f 84 51 01 00 00 b8 01 00 00 00 44 89 f1 d3 e0
> [ 0.597537] RIP [<ffffffff81182587>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xb7/0x940
> [ 0.604158] RSP <ffff88085b1ebac8>
> [ 0.607643] CR2: 0000000000001b08
> [ 0.610962] ---[ end trace 0a600c0841386992 ]---
> [ 0.615573] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> [ 0.620792] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
> *From:* Rob Herring <mailto:robherring2 at gmail.com>
> *Date:* 2015-04-14 00:49
> *To:* Konstantin Khlebnikov <mailto:khlebnikov at yandex-team.ru>
> *CC:* Grant Likely <mailto:grant.likely at linaro.org>;
> devicetree at vger.kernel.org <mailto:devicetree at vger.kernel.org>; Rob
> Herring <mailto:robh+dt at kernel.org>; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> <mailto:linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>; sparclinux at vger.kernel.org
> <mailto:sparclinux at vger.kernel.org>; linux-mm at kvack.org
> <mailto:linux-mm at kvack.org>; linuxppc-dev
> <mailto:linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH] of: return NUMA_NO_NODE from fallback
> of_node_to_nid()
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> <khlebnikov at yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> > On 13.04.2015 16:22, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
> >> <khlebnikov at yandex-team.ru> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Node 0 might be offline as well as any other numa node,
> >>> in this case kernel cannot handle memory allocation and crashes.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov at yandex-team.ru>
> >>> Fixes: 0c3f061c195c ("of: implement of_node_to_nid as a weak function")
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/of/base.c | 2 +-
> >>> include/linux/of.h | 5 ++++-
> >>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> >>> index 8f165b112e03..51f4bd16e613 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> >>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_n_size_cells);
> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> >>> int __weak of_node_to_nid(struct device_node *np)
> >>> {
> >>> - return numa_node_id();
> >>> + return NUMA_NO_NODE;
> >>
> >>
> >> This is going to break any NUMA machine that enables OF and expects
> >> the weak function to work.
> >
> >
> > Why? NUMA_NO_NODE == -1 -- this's standard "no-affinity" signal.
> > As I see powerpc/sparc versions of of_node_to_nid returns -1 if they
> > cannot find out which node should be used.
> Ah, I was thinking those platforms were relying on the default
> implementation. I guess any real NUMA support is going to need to
> override this function. The arm64 patch series does that as well. We
> need to be sure this change is correct for metag which appears to be
> the only other OF enabled platform with NUMA support.
> In that case, then there is little reason to keep the inline and we
> can just always enable the weak function (with your change). It is
> slightly less optimal, but the few callers hardly appear to be hot
> paths.
> Rob
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Konstantin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20150429/47a596c1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list