[RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook

Laurent Dufour ldufour at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Apr 14 19:26:13 AEST 2015


On 13/04/2015 22:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:02:19 +0300 "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill at shutemov.name> wrote:
> 
>>> Kirill, if I'm right with it, can you suggest the header where to put
>>> the "generic" mremap hook's (empty) body?
>>
>> I initially thought it would be enough to put it into
>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h>, expecting it works as
>> <asm-generic/pgtable.h>. But that's not the case.
>>
>> It probably worth at some point rework all <asm/mmu_context.h> to include
>> <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> at the end as we do for <asm/pgtable.h>.
>> But that's outside the scope of the patchset, I guess.
>>
>> I don't see any better candidate for such dummy header. :-/
> 
> Do away with __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP and do it like this:
> 
> arch/x/include/asm/y.h:
> 
> 	extern void arch_remap(...);
> 	#define arch_remap arch_remap
> 
> include/linux/z.h:
> 
> 	#include <asm/y.h>
> 
> 	#ifndef arch_remap
> 	static inline void arch_remap(...) { }
> 	#define arch_remap arch_remap
> 	#endif

Hi Andrew,

I like your idea, but I can't find any good candidate for <asm/y.h> and
<linux/z.h>.

I tried with <linux/mm.h> and <asm/mmu_context.h> but
<asm/mmu_context.h> is already including <linux/mm.h>.

Do you have any suggestion ?

Another option could be to do it like the actual arch_unmap() in
<asm-generic/mm_hooks.h> but this is the opposite of your idea, and Ingo
was not comfortable with this idea due to the impact of the other
architectures.

Cheers,
Laurent.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list