[PATCH v8 RFC 0/3] Generic IOMMU pooled allocator
David Miller
davem at davemloft.net
Wed Apr 1 05:08:48 AEDT 2015
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan at oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 14:06:42 -0400
> Having bravely said that..
>
> the IB team informs me that they see a 10% degradation using
> the spin_lock as opposed to the trylock.
>
> one path going forward is to continue processing this patch-set
> as is. I can investigate this further, and later revise the spin_lock
> to the trylock, after we are certain that it is good/necessary.
>
> thoughts?
Let's address the trylock vs. spin_lock thing later and use plain
spin_lock for now.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list