[PATCH 03/15] powerpc/msi: Improve IRQ bitmap allocator
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Sat Sep 20 06:19:46 EST 2014
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 15:16 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 18:26 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > From: Ian Munsie <imunsie at au1.ibm.com>
> >
> > Currently msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() will round up any IRQ allocation requests
> > to the nearest power of 2. eg. ask for 5 IRQs and you'll get 8. This wastes a
> > lot of IRQs which can be a scarce resource.
> >
> > For cxl we can require multiple IRQs for every contexts that is attached to the
> > accelerator. For AFU directed accelerators, there may be 1000s of contexts
> > attached, hence we can easily run out of IRQs, especially if we are needlessly
> > wasting them.
> >
> > This changes the msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs() to allocate only the required number
> > of IRQs, hence avoiding this wastage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <imunsie at au1.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <mikey at neuling.org>
> > ---
> > arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> This conflicts with (and partially duplicates)
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/381892/
> which I have in my tree. How should we handle it?
>
> Laurentiu, from looking at the overlap between patches I see a problem
> with your existing patch, regarding the out-of-irqs path and
> msi_bitmap_free_hwirqs(), so one way or another that needs to get fixed
> soon.
Given the problems with Laurentiu's patch, perhaps it'd be best for me
to just revert that patch in my tree, and respin it after this patchset
has been merged.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list