[RFC PATCH 1/2]powerpc: foundation code to handle CR5 for local_t
Madhavan Srinivasan
maddy at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Fri Nov 28 14:00:25 AEDT 2014
On Friday 28 November 2014 07:28 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 10:56 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 05:48:40PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
>>> Here is the design of this patch. Since local_* operations
>>> are only need to be atomic to interrupts (IIUC), patch uses
>>> one of the Condition Register (CR) fields as a flag variable. When
>>> entering the local_*, specific bit in the CR5 field is set
>>> and on exit, bit is cleared. CR bit checking is done in the
>>> interrupt return path. If CR5[EQ] bit set and if we return
>>> to kernel, we reset to start of local_* operation.
>>
>> Have you tested this with (upcoming) GCC 5.0? GCC now uses CR5,
>> and it likes to use it very much, it might be more convenient to
>> use e.g. CR1 (which is allocated almost last, only before CR0).
>
> We use CR1 all over the place in your asm code. Any other suggestion ?
>
Yes. CR1 is used in many places and so do CR7. And CR0 are alway used
for dot instn. And I guess Vector instructions use CR6.
> What's the damage of -ffixed-cr5 on gcc5 ? won't it just use CR4 or 6
> instead ?
>
Will try this today with GCC 5.0.
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h
>>> @@ -306,7 +306,26 @@ do_kvm_##n: \
>>> std r10,0(r1); /* make stack chain pointer */ \
>>> std r0,GPR0(r1); /* save r0 in stackframe */ \
>>> std r10,GPR1(r1); /* save r1 in stackframe */ \
>>> - beq 4f; /* if from kernel mode */ \
>>> +BEGIN_FTR_SECTION; \
>>> + lis r9,4096; /* Create a mask with HV and PR */ \
>>> + rldicr r9,r9,32,31; /* bits, AND with the MSR */ \
>>> + mr r10,r9; /* to check for Hyp state */ \
>>> + ori r9,r9,16384; \
>>> + and r9,r12,r9; \
>>> + cmpd cr3,r10,r9; \
>>> + beq cr3,66f; /* Jump if we come from Hyp mode*/ \
>>> + mtcrf 0x04,r10; /* Clear CR5 if coming from usr */ \
>>
>> Wow, such nastiness, only to avoid using dot insns (since you need to keep
>> the current CR0 value for the following beq 4f). And CR0 already holds the
>> PR bit, so you need only to check the HV bit anyway? Some restructuring
>> would make this a lot simpler and clearer.
>>
>>> + /*
>>> + * Now that we are about to exit from interrupt, lets check for
>>> + * cr5 eq bit. If it is set, then we may be in the middle of
>>> + * local_t update. In this case, we should rewind the NIP
>>> + * accordingly.
>>> + */
>>> + mfcr r3
>>> + andi. r4,r3,0x200
>>> + beq 63f
>>
>> This is just bne cr5,63f isn't it?
>>
>>> index 72e783e..edb75a9 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
>>> @@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ masked_##_H##interrupt: \
>>> rldicl r10,r10,48,1; /* clear MSR_EE */ \
>>> rotldi r10,r10,16; \
>>> mtspr SPRN_##_H##SRR1,r10; \
>>> -2: mtcrf 0x80,r9; \
>>> +2: mtcrf 0x90,r9; \
>>> ld r9,PACA_EXGEN+EX_R9(r13); \
>>> ld r10,PACA_EXGEN+EX_R10(r13); \
>>> ld r11,PACA_EXGEN+EX_R11(r13); \
>>
>> What does this do?
>>
>>
>> Segher
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list