[PATCH] i2c-qoriq: modified compatibility for correct prescaler

[Wolfram Sang]

> > 
> > If we're going to change the device tree I'd rather just add a property
> > to say what the prescaler is.
> 
>  We would however, leave the boards' device trees that use things like
> "fsl,mpc8543-i2c" as is and introduce the prescaler for the others requiring it.
> 
> 
> Now the drawback is that the driver would require a change, to parse this
> prescaler new prescaler property. Would this be OK from your point of view
> Wolfram ? If yes, I will send the patches for it.

I don't think it is OK. I'd think it can be deduced from the compatible
property. Let's ask the DT experts here. I'll follow their suggestion.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20141114/bf2b02ed/attachment.sig>