[PATCH v2 01/10] DMA, CMA: clean-up log message

[Joonsoo Kim]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:11:19AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com> writes:
> 
> > We don't need explicit 'CMA:' prefix, since we already define prefix
> > 'cma:' in pr_fmt. So remove it.
> >
> > And, some logs print function name and others doesn't. This looks
> > bad to me, so I unify log format to print function name consistently.
> >
> > Lastly, I add one more debug log on cma_activate_area().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > index 83969f8..bd0bb81 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/dma-contiguous.c
> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void __init dma_contiguous_reserve(phys_addr_t limit)
> >  	}
> >
> >  	if (selected_size && !dma_contiguous_default_area) {
> > -		pr_debug("%s: reserving %ld MiB for global area\n", __func__,
> > +		pr_debug("%s(): reserving %ld MiB for global area\n", __func__,
> >  			 (unsigned long)selected_size / SZ_1M);
> 
> Do we need to do function(), or just function:. I have seen the later
> usage in other parts of the kernel.

Hello,

I also haven't seen this format in other kernel code, but, in cma, they use
this format as following.

function(arg1, arg2, ...): some message

If we all dislike this format, we can change it after merging this
patchset. Until then, it seems better to me to leave it as is.

> 
> >
> >  		dma_contiguous_reserve_area(selected_size, selected_base,
> > @@ -163,8 +163,9 @@ static int __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma)
> >  	unsigned i = cma->count >> pageblock_order;
> >  	struct zone *zone;
> >
> > -	cma->bitmap = kzalloc(bitmap_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	pr_debug("%s()\n", __func__);
> 
> why ?
> 

This pr_debug() comes from ppc kvm's kvm_cma_init_reserved_areas().
I want to maintain all log messages as much as possible to reduce confusion
with this generalization.

Thanks.