<fsl,qman-channel-id> in dts file
Emil Medve
Emilian.Medve at Freescale.com
Tue Jun 10 23:18:17 EST 2014
Hello Tony,
On 06/09/2014 10:28 AM, Tony wrote:
> Thank Emil.
>
> Where can i find the details about a 'diff' of qman revisions ?
Let me look if someody bothered to write an AN about this
> The code
> i ported doesnt support latest qman revision (REV3).
Ported from what (I suspect) SDK release? v1.5 should already have
support for the latest xMan revision(s)
> Can i still work on
> qman REV1.1 for all the latest targets ? (read t-series)
I'm inclined to say yes (of course the new features will not be
available), but I need to have a look at the code to see with what
limitations
Cheers,
> Regards
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve at freescale.com
> <mailto:Emilian.Medve at freescale.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello Tony,
>
>
> On 06/09/2014 06:43 AM, Tony wrote:
> > How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ?
>
> Channel ids are assigned in hardware
>
> > Is there any document on how this value is achieved ?
>
> They are described in the RM of each SoC and in the DPAA RM
>
> > Or can it be any value ???
>
> Nope. It must be the right value or frames will end up in the wrong
> portal or worse
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list