[PATCH] powerpc: don't re-issue spinlock typedef that breaks older gcc
Aneesh Kumar K.V
aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Wed Jan 29 05:49:38 EST 2014
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> writes:
> On 14-01-28 12:28 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> writes:
>>
>>> Commit b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f ("powerpc/thp: Fix
>>> crash on mremap") added a "typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;"
>>> which on gcc 4.5.2 (and possibly other versions) causes many of:
>>>
>>> include/linux/spinlock_types.h:76:3: error: redefinition of typedef 'spinlock_t'
>>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h:563:25: note: previous declaration of 'spinlock_t' was here
>>> In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:15:0,
>>> from include/linux/notifier.h:13,
>>> from include/linux/pm_qos.h:8,
>>> from include/linux/netdevice.h:28,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wil6210.h:20,
>>> from drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/debug.c:17:
>>>
>>> It appears that somewhere between gcc 4.5.2 and 4.6.3 this
>>> redefinition restriction was lifted. Using the proper header
>>> from within !ASSEMBLY seems to fix it up in an acceptable way.
>>>
>>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov at linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://mid.gmane.org/1389939036.3000.7.camel@ThinkPad-T5421.cn.ibm.com
>>
>> This was posted earlier.
>
> I see. Well I guess Ben didn't use it since it is the same as the
> temporary not-signed-off-by hack patch I posted earlier as well.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/27/584
>
> I believe what I've posted here below to be the proper fix.
I had another variant which needed this
http://mid.gmane.org/1388999012-14424-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
BTW I had added the above struct spinlock; patch as the backport to
stable 3.13 series. So if we are picking another one, we may need to
update stable also
-aneesh
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list