mpic build failure for 7447_hpc defconfig (bisected)
Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
Thu Jan 9 09:45:30 EST 2014
Commit 446f6d06fab0b49c61887ecbe8286d6aaa796637 ("powerpc/mpic: Properly
set default triggers") breaks the mpc7447_hpc_defconfig as follows:
CC arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.o
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c: In function 'mpic_set_irq_type':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c:886:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c:890:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c:894:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c:898:9: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
Looking at the cpp output (gcc 4.7.3 from the kernel.org toolchains), I see:
case mpic->hw_set[MPIC_IDX_VECPRI_SENSE_EDGE] |
mpic->hw_set[MPIC_IDX_VECPRI_POLARITY_POSITIVE]:
The pointer into an array appears because CONFIG_MPIC_WEIRD=y is set for
this thing.
-------------------
#ifdef CONFIG_MPIC_WEIRD
static u32 mpic_infos[][MPIC_IDX_END] = {
[0] = { /* Original OpenPIC compatible MPIC */
[...]
#define MPIC_INFO(name) mpic->hw_set[MPIC_IDX_##name]
#else /* CONFIG_MPIC_WEIRD */
#define MPIC_INFO(name) MPIC_##name
#endif /* CONFIG_MPIC_WEIRD */
-------------------
Given it has been broken since 3.4-rc5, is it safe to say MPIC_WEIRD is dead
and unused? Or should the case be converted to if/else or similar? Or were
other versions of gcc actually able to "see" constant numbers?
Paul.
--
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list