[PATCH] of: give priority to the compatible match in __of_match_node()
Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortmaker at windriver.com
Thu Feb 20 09:44:26 EST 2014
On 14-02-19 05:40 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:23:02 -0500, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> wrote:
>> On 14-02-19 03:41 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 13:25:54 -0500, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Kevin Hao <haokexin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> When the device node do have a compatible property, we definitely
>>>>>> prefer the compatible match besides the type and name. Only if
>>>>>> there is no such a match, we then consider the candidate which
>>>>>> doesn't have compatible entry but do match the type or name with
>>>>>> the device node.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is based on a patch from Sebastian Hesselbarth.
>>>>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/319434/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did some code refactoring and also fixed a bug in the original patch.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm inclined to just revert this once again and avoid possibly
>>>>> breaking yet another platform.
>>>>
>>>> Well, for what it is worth, today's (Feb19th) linux-next tree fails to boot
>>>> on my sbc8548. It fails with:
>>>
>>> I think I've got it fixed now with the latest series. Please try the
>>> devicetree/merge branch on git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux
>>
>> That seems to work.
>
> Great, thanks for the testing. Can I add a Tested-by line for you?
Absolutely; sorry for not thinking to explicitly indicate that.
P.
--
>
> g.
>
>>
>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: enabled errata workarounds, flags: 0x4
>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: mac: 02:e0:0c:00:05:fd
>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: Running with NAPI enabled
>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: RX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: TX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet: enabled errata workarounds, flags: 0x4
>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: mac: 02:e0:0c:00:06:fd
>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: Running with NAPI enabled
>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: RX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: TX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>> TCP: cubic registered
>> Initializing XFRM netlink socket
>> NET: Registered protocol family 17
>>
>> ...
>>
>> root at sbc8548:~# cat /proc/version
>> Linux version 3.14.0-rc3-00024-g7119f42057c6 (paul at yow-lpgnfs-02) (gcc version 4.5.2 (GCC) ) #1 Wed Feb 19 16:08:17 EST 2014
>> root at sbc8548:~#
>>
>> Paul.
>> --
>>
>>>
>>> g.
>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> mdio_bus ethernet at e002400: /soc8548 at e0000000/ethernet at 24000/mdio at 520
>>>> PHY address 1312 is too large
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> mdio_bus ethernet at e002500: /soc8548 at e0000000/ethernet at 25000/mdio at 520
>>>> PHY address 1312 is too large
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> TCP: cubic registered
>>>> Initializing XFRM netlink socket
>>>> NET: Registered protocol family 17
>>>> <fail nfs mount>
>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> On a normal boot, we should see this:
>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> libphy: Freescale PowerQUICC MII Bus: probed
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet: enabled errata workarounds, flags: 0x4
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: mac: 02:e0:0c:00:05:fd
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: Running with NAPI enabled
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: RX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0024000.ethernet eth0: TX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet: enabled errata workarounds, flags: 0x4
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: mac: 02:e0:0c:00:06:fd
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: Running with NAPI enabled
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: RX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>>>> fsl-gianfar e0025000.ethernet eth1: TX BD ring size for Q[0]: 256
>>>> TCP: cubic registered
>>>> Initializing XFRM netlink socket
>>>> NET: Registered protocol family 17
>>>> -----------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Git bisect says:
>>>>
>>>> ee8b26ad943aa34acc03ae6cde2b81d8d3d483d4 is the first bad commit
>>>> commit ee8b26ad943aa34acc03ae6cde2b81d8d3d483d4
>>>> Author: Kevin Hao <haokexin at gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue Feb 18 15:57:30 2014 +0800
>>>>
>>>> of: reimplement the matching method for __of_match_node()
>>>>
>>>> In the current implementation of __of_match_node(), it will compare
>>>> each given match entry against all the node's compatible strings
>>>> with of_device_is_compatible().
>>>>
>>>> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
>>>> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
>>>> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and
>>>> also an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, we define a following priority order for the match, and
>>>> then scan all the entries to find the best match.
>>>> 1. specific compatible && type && name
>>>> 2. specific compatible && type
>>>> 3. specific compatible && name
>>>> 4. specific compatible
>>>> 5. general compatible && type && name
>>>> 6. general compatible && type
>>>> 7. general compatible && name
>>>> 8. general compatible
>>>> 9. type && name
>>>> 10. type
>>>> 11. name
>>>>
>>>> This is based on some pseudo-codes provided by Grant Likely.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin at gmail.com>
>>>> [grant.likely: Changed multiplier to 4 which makes more sense]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at linaro.org>
>>>>
>>>> :040000 040000 8f5dd19174417aece63b308ff299a5dbe2efa5a0
>>>> 8401b0e3903e23e973845ee75b26b04345d803d2 M drivers
>>>>
>>>> As a double check, I checked out the head of linux-next, and did a
>>>> revert of the above commit, and my sbc8548 can then boot properly.
>>>>
>>>> Not doing anything fancy ; using the defconfig exactly as-is, and
>>>> ensuring the dtb is fresh from linux-next HEAD of today.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Paul.
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I think I would like to see this structured differently. We
>>>>> basically have 2 ways of matching: the existing pre-3.14 way and the
>>>>> desired match on best compatible only. All new bindings should match
>>>>> with the new way and the old way needs to be kept for compatibility.
>>>>> So lets structure the code that way. Search the match table first for
>>>>> best compatible with name and type NULL, then search the table the old
>>>>> way. I realize it appears you are doing this, but it is not clear this
>>>>> is the intent of the code. I would like to see this written as a patch
>>>>> with commit 105353145eafb3ea919 reverted first and you add a new match
>>>>> function to call first and then fallback to the existing function.
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin at gmail.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/of/base.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>>>>>> index ff85450d5683..9d655df458bd 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>>>>>> @@ -730,32 +730,45 @@ out:
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_find_node_with_property);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static int of_match_type_or_name(const struct device_node *node,
>>>>>> + const struct of_device_id *m)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + int match = 1;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (m->name[0])
>>>>>> + match &= node->name && !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (m->type[0])
>>>>>> + match &= node->type && !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + return match;
>>>>>> +}
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> static
>>>>>> const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>>>> const struct device_node *node)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> const char *cp;
>>>>>> int cplen, l;
>>>>>> + const struct of_device_id *m;
>>>>>> + int match;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (!matches)
>>>>>> return NULL;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> cp = __of_get_property(node, "compatible", &cplen);
>>>>>> - do {
>>>>>> - const struct of_device_id *m = matches;
>>>>>> + while (cp && (cplen > 0)) {
>>>>>> + m = matches;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Check against matches with current compatible string */
>>>>>> while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>>>>>> - int match = 1;
>>>>>> - if (m->name[0])
>>>>>> - match &= node->name
>>>>>> - && !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>>>>>> - if (m->type[0])
>>>>>> - match &= node->type
>>>>>> - && !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>>>>>> - if (m->compatible[0])
>>>>>> - match &= cp
>>>>>> - && !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>>>>>> + if (!m->compatible[0]) {
>>>>>> + m++;
>>>>>> + continue;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + match = of_match_type_or_name(node, m);
>>>>>> + match &= cp && !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>>>>>> strlen(m->compatible));
>>>>>> if (match)
>>>>>> return m;
>>>>>> @@ -763,12 +776,18 @@ const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Get node's next compatible string */
>>>>>> - if (cp) {
>>>>>> - l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>>>>>> - cp += l;
>>>>>> - cplen -= l;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> - } while (cp && (cplen > 0));
>>>>>> + l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>>>>>> + cp += l;
>>>>>> + cplen -= l;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + m = matches;
>>>>>> + /* Check against matches without compatible string */
>>>>>> + while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>>>>>> + if (!m->compatible[0] && of_match_type_or_name(node, m))
>>>>>> + return m;
>>>>>> + m++;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> return NULL;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 1.8.5.3
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>>>>> Linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
>>>>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>>>
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list