[PATCH V2] powerpc: thp: Fix crash on mremap

Benjamin Herrenschmidt benh at kernel.crashing.org
Wed Feb 12 05:52:52 EST 2014


On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 09:31 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 07:21:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > This patch fix the below crash
> > 
> > NIP [c00000000004cee4] .__hash_page_thp+0x2a4/0x440
> > LR [c0000000000439ac] .hash_page+0x18c/0x5e0
> > ...
> > Call Trace:
> > [c000000736103c40] [00001ffffb000000] 0x1ffffb000000(unreliable)
> > [437908.479693] [c000000736103d50] [c0000000000439ac] .hash_page+0x18c/0x5e0
> > [437908.479699] [c000000736103e30] [c00000000000924c] .do_hash_page+0x4c/0x58
> > 
> > On ppc64 we use the pgtable for storing the hpte slot information and
> > store address to the pgtable at a constant offset (PTRS_PER_PMD) from
> > pmd. On mremap, when we switch the pmd, we need to withdraw and deposit
> > the pgtable again, so that we find the pgtable at PTRS_PER_PMD offset
> > from new pmd.
> > 
> > We also want to move the withdraw and deposit before the set_pmd so
> > that, when page fault find the pmd as trans huge we can be sure that
> > pgtable can be located at the offset.
> > 
> > variant of upstream SHA1: b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f
> > for 3.12 stable series
> 
> This doesn't look like a "variant", it looks totally different.  Why
> can't I just take the b3084f4db3aeb991c507ca774337c7e7893ed04f patch
> (and follow-on fix) for 3.12?
> 
> I _REALLY_ dislike patches that are totally different from Linus's tree
> in stable trees, it has caused nothing but problems in the past.

I don't think it applies... (I tried on an internal tree) but the
affected function changed in 3.13 in various ways. Aneesh, please
provide a more details explanation and whether we should backport those
other changes too or whether this is not necessary.

BTW. Aneesh, we need a 3.11.x one too

Cheers,
Ben.




More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list