[PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory

[Christoph Lameter]

On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> > Right so if we are ignoring the node then the simplest thing to do is to
> > not deactivate the current cpu slab but to take an object from it.
>
> Ok, that's what Anton's patch does, I believe. Are you ok with that
> patch as it is?

No. Again his patch only works if the node is memoryless not if there are
other issues that prevent allocation from that node.