[PATCH] slub: Don't throw away partial remote slabs if there is no local memory

Christoph Lameter cl at linux.com
Fri Feb 7 04:25:29 EST 2014


On Wed, 5 Feb 2014, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:

> > Right so if we are ignoring the node then the simplest thing to do is to
> > not deactivate the current cpu slab but to take an object from it.
>
> Ok, that's what Anton's patch does, I believe. Are you ok with that
> patch as it is?

No. Again his patch only works if the node is memoryless not if there are
other issues that prevent allocation from that node.



More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list