[RFC PATCH] powerpc: Make SPU_FS depend on SPARSEMEM
Pranith Kumar
bobby.prani at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 23:09:04 EST 2014
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert at linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> Is this a randconfig kernel?
Yes, randconfig with ARCH=powerpc.
>
> config ARCH_SPARSEMEM_DEFAULT
> def_bool y
> depends on (SMP && PPC_PSERIES) || PPC_PS3
>
> Why is this not enabled? !SMP? !PPC_PSERIES? !PPC_PS3?
This was indeed enabled, but that does not do much. We will need
CONFIG_SPARSEMEM which depends on CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_MANUAL which was
not enabled.
>
> If PPC_CELL is enabled, this issue was introduced by
>
> commit 78bde53e351bc89cff85d1c2c7e6d7c2ffdf120d
> Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Tue Feb 13 11:46:06 2007 +1100
>
> [POWERPC] spufs: remove need for struct page for SPEs
>
> This patch removes the need for struct page for SPE local store
> and registers from spufs. It also makes the locking much more
> obvious and no longer relying on the truncate logic black magic
> for protecting against races between unmap_mapping_range() and
> new pages faulted in. It does so by switching to a nopfn() handler
> and using the new vm_insert_pfn() to setup the PTEs itself while
> holding a lock on the SPE.
>
> The nice thing is that this patch actually removes a lot more code
> than it adds :-)
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
>
>
> Another question: why does SPU_FS select MEMORY_HOTPLUG?
Not really sure :(
>
> commit 4da30d15b6d5036b0d96422d6946ca758111fae3
> Author: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand at am.sony.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 23 20:57:49 2006 +0200
>
> [POWERPC] spufs: fix memory hotplug dependency
>
> spufs_base.c calls __add_pages, which depends on CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.
>
> Moved the selection of CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG from CONFIG_SPUFS_MMAP
> to CONFIG_SPU_FS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoffrey.levand at am.sony.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann at de.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus at samba.org>
>
> However, the call to __add_pages() has been moved a few times afterwards,
> to be finally removed in the aforementioned commit
> 78bde53e351bc89cff85d1c2c7e6d7c2ffdf120d.
>
> Does it still build/work if you just drop the "select MEMORY_HOTPLUG"?
I should have saved the config file :(. I think it will build since
the problem was that hotplug-memory.o needs CONFIG_SPARSEMEM.
--
Pranith
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list