Please revert 928bea964827d7824b548c1f8e06eccbbc4d0d7d

Yinghai Lu yinghai at kernel.org
Sat Sep 28 08:56:34 EST 2013


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-09-27 at 14:54 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>> <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Wouldn't it be better to simply have pci_enable_device() always set bus
>> > master on a bridge? I don't see any case where it makes sense to have
>> > an enabled bridge without the master bit set on it...
>>
>> Do you mean attached?
>
> So this patch works and fixes the problem. I think it makes the whole
> thing more robust and should be applied.

good.

>
> I still don't know why the bridge doesn't get enabled properly without
> it yes, tracking it down (the machine in question takes a LONG time to
> reboot :-)

ok, please if you are ok attached one instead. It will print some warning about
driver skipping pci_set_master, so we can catch more problem with drivers.

Thanks

Yinghai
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pci_set_master_again_v2.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1420 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20130927/f9e1e11f/attachment.obj>


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list