Please revert 928bea964827d7824b548c1f8e06eccbbc4d0d7d

[Yinghai Lu]

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to simply have pci_enable_device() always set bus
> master on a bridge? I don't see any case where it makes sense to have
> an enabled bridge without the master bit set on it...

Do you mean attached?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pci_set_master_again.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 510 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20130927/2b68578c/attachment.obj>