[PATCH v2 2/6] PCI/MSI: Factor out pci_get_msi_cap() interface
Michael Ellerman
michael at ellerman.id.au
Wed Sep 18 00:30:23 EST 2013
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:22:11PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:20:44PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 06, 2013 at 05:32:05PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > I propose that you rework it that way, and at least find out what
> > > (if anything) would break if we do that. Or maybe we just give up
> > > some optimization; it would be nice to quantify that, too.
> >
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > The series is what it seems a direction to take.
> >
> > Looks like we need PPC folks to agree on the quota check update
> > for pSeries (yes, they do bail out with a positive return value
> > from arch_msi_check_device()):
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> An initiative to simplify MSI/MSI-X allocation interface is brewing.
> It seems pSeries quota thing is an obstacle. If it could be given up
> (patch 2/9).
How about no?
We have a small number of MSIs available, limited by hardware &
firmware, if we don't impose a quota then the first device that probes
will get most/all of the MSIs and other devices miss out.
Anyway I don't see what problem you're trying to solve? I agree the
-ve/0/+ve return value pattern is ugly, but it's hardly the end of the
world.
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list