[PATCH v3 0/8] Getting rid of get_unused_fd() / use O_CLOEXEC
Yann Droneaud
ydroneaud at opteya.com
Fri Sep 6 20:39:50 EST 2013
Hi,
With help from subsystem maintainers, I've managed to get some of
get_unused_fd() calls converted to use get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC)
instead. [ANDROID][IB][VFIO]
KVM subsystem maintainers helped me to change calls to anon_inode_getfd()
to use O_CLOEXEC by default. [KVM]
Some maintainers applied my patches to convert get_unused_fd() to
get_unused_fd_flags(0) were using O_CLOEXEC wasn't possible without breaking ABI.
[SCTP][XFS]
So, still in the hope to get rid of get_unused_fd(), please find a another
attempt to remove get_unused_fd() macro and encourage subsystems to use
get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC) or anon_inode_getfd(O_CLOEXEC) by default
were appropriate.
The patchset convert all calls to get_unused_fd()
to get_unused_fd_flags(0) before removing get_unused_fd() macro.
Without get_unused_fd() macro, more subsystems are likely to use
anon_inode_getfd() and be teached to provide an API that let userspace
choose the opening flags of the file descriptor.
Additionally I'm suggesting Industrial IO (IIO) subsystem to use
anon_inode_getfd(O_CLOEXEC): it's the only subsystem using anon_inode_getfd()
with a fixed set of flags not including O_CLOEXEC.
Not using O_CLOEXEC by default or not letting userspace provide the "open" flags
should be considered bad practice from security point of view:
in most case O_CLOEXEC must be used to not leak file descriptor across exec().
Using O_CLOEXEC by default when flags are not provided by userspace allows it
to choose, without race, if the file descriptor is going to be inherited
across exec().
Status:
In linux-next tag 20130906, they're currently:
- 22 calls to get_unused_fd_flags() (+3)
not counting get_unused_fd() and anon_inode_getfd()
- 7 calls to get_unused_fd() (-3)
- 11 calls to anon_inode_getfd() (0)
Changes from patchset v2 [PATCHSETv2]:
- android/sw_sync: use get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC) instead of get_unused_fd()
DROPPED: applied upstream
- android/sync: use get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC) instead of get_unused_fd()
DROPPED: applied upstream
- vfio: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
DROPPED: applied upstream.
Additionally subsystem maintainer applied another patch on top
to set the flags to O_CLOEXEC.
- industrialio: use anon_inode_getfd() with O_CLOEXEC flag
NEW: propose to use O_CLOEXEC as default flag.
Links:
[ANDROID]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACSP8SjXGMk2_kX_+RgzqqQwqKernvF1Wt3K5tw991W5dfAnCA@mail.gmail.com
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACSP8SjZcpcpEtQHzcGYhf-MP7QGo0XpN7-uN7rmD=vNtopG=w@mail.gmail.com
[IB]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAL1RGDXV1_BjSLrQDFdVQ1_D75+bMtOtikHOUp8VBiy_OJUf=w@mail.gmail.com
[VFIO]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130822171744.1297.13711.stgit@bling.home
[KVM]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5219A8FC.8090307@redhat.com
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/3557EF65-4327-4DAE-999A-B0EE13C433F5@suse.de
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130826102023.GA8218@redhat.com
[SCTP]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/51D312E8.6090702@gmail.com
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130702.161428.1703028286206350504.davem@davemloft.net
[XFS]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130709205321.GV20932@sgi.com
[PATCHSETv2]
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1376327678.git.ydroneaud@opteya.com
Yann Droneaud (8):
ia64: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
ppc/cell: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
binfmt_misc: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
file: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
fanotify: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
events: use get_unused_fd_flags(0) instead of get_unused_fd()
file: remove get_unused_fd()
industrialio: use anon_inode_getfd() with O_CLOEXEC flag
arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c | 2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/inode.c | 4 ++--
drivers/iio/industrialio-event.c | 2 +-
fs/binfmt_misc.c | 2 +-
fs/file.c | 2 +-
fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c | 2 +-
include/linux/file.h | 1 -
kernel/events/core.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list