[RFC PATCH 00/11 Allow PR and HV KVM to coexist in one kernel

[Alexander Graf]

On 10/01/2013 01:36 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 10/01/2013 01:26 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Alexander Graf<agraf at suse.de>  writes:
>>
>>> On 09/30/2013 03:09 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>> Alexander Graf<agraf at suse.de>   writes:
>>>>
>>>>> On 27.09.2013, at 12:52, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V"<aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>   writes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch series support enabling HV and PR KVM together in the 
>>>>>>> same kernel. We
>>>>>>> extend machine property with new property "kvm_type". A value of 
>>>>>>> 1 will force HV
>>>>>>> KVM and 2 PR KVM. The default value is 0 which will select the 
>>>>>>> fastest KVM mode.
>>>>>>> ie, HV if that is supported otherwise PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With Qemu command line having
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm_type=1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# bash ../qemu
>>>>>>> failed to initialize KVM: Invalid argument
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# modprobe kvm-pr
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# bash ../qemu
>>>>>>> failed to initialize KVM: Invalid argument
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# modprobe  kvm-hv
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# bash ../qemu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> now with
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -machine pseries,accel=kvm,kvm_type=2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# rmmod kvm-pr
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# bash ../qemu
>>>>>>> failed to initialize KVM: Invalid argument
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]#
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# modprobe kvm-pr
>>>>>>> [root at llmp24l02 qemu]# bash ../qemu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if don't specify kvm_type machine property, it will take a 
>>>>>>> default value 0,
>>>>>>> which means fastest supported.
>>>>>> Related qemu patch
>>>>>>
>>>>>> commit 8d139053177d48a70cb710b211ea4c2843eccdfb
>>>>>> Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V<aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>> Date:   Mon Sep 23 12:28:37 2013 +0530
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      kvm: Add a new machine property kvm_type
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Targets like ppc64 support different type of KVM, one which use
>>>>>>      hypervisor mode and the other which doesn't. Add a new machine
>>>>>>      property kvm_type that helps in selecting the respective ones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar 
>>>>>> K.V<aneesh.kumar at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> This really is too early, as we can't possibly run in HV mode for
>>>>> non-pseries machines, so the interpretation (or at least sanity
>>>>> checking) of what values are reasonable should occur in the
>>>>> machine. That's why it's a variable in the "machine opts".
>>>> With the current code CREATE_VM will fail, because we won't have
>>>> kvm-hv.ko loaded and trying to create a vm with type 1 will fail.
>>>> Now the challenge related to moving that to machine_init or later 
>>>> is, we
>>>> depend on HV or PR callback early in CREATE_VM. With the changes we 
>>>> have
>>>>
>>>> int kvmppc_core_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>>> {
>>>>
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>>>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.spapr_tce_tables);
>>>>     INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.rtas_tokens);
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>>     return kvm->arch.kvm_ops->init_vm(kvm);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Also the mmu notifier callback do end up calling kvm_unmap_hva etc 
>>>> which
>>>> are all HV/PR dependent.
>>> Yes, so we should verify in the machine models that we're runnable with
>>> the currently selected type at least, to give the user a sensible error
>>> message.
>> Something like the below
>
> I like that one a lot. Andreas, Paolo, what do you think?

To clarify this a bit more, this patch is missing a few critical pieces:

   1) The default implementation for the kvm_type callback needs to 
error out when kvm_type is set to anything
   2) All non-papr-non-e500-PPC machines should force "PR only" mode and 
bail out on anything else
   3) We're missing sensible error messages for the user still when the 
VM could not get created

but I like the overall concept :).


Alex