[PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig

[Scott Wood]

On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:57 -0600, Emil Medve wrote:
> Hello Scott,
> 
> 
> On 11/12/2013 04:04 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> >> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have CONFIG_P1023RDS=y.
> >> Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan at freescale.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig  |  188 ----------------------------
> >>  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig     |   18 +++
> >>  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig |   17 +++
> >>  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
> >>  delete mode 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig
> > 
> > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we finally
> > get datapath support upstream?  That's a lot of code to add to the 85xx
> > config just for this one chip.
> 
> Yes. But for mpc85xx_/smp_defconfig the datapath support shouldn't be
> enabled by default given that just one SoC in that family has the
> datapath (and we don't plan to put it in another e500v2 based SoC). For
> regression/automation purposes config fragments should be used

Is there any way to specify a meta-config for p1023 (or e500v2-dpaa or
whatever) that says to combine mpc85xx_smp_defconfig with a dpaa
fragment?  Do we have any config fragments in the tree so far?

-Scott