[PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig

[Roy Zang]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:52 PM
> To: Zang Roy-R61911
> Cc: Pan Lijun-B44306; linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig into
> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig
> 
> On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 16:49 -0600, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-
> > > fei.zang=freescale.com at lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Scott Wood
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:05 PM
> > > To: Pan Lijun-B44306
> > > Cc: linuxppc-dev at ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: Merge 85xx/p1023_defconfig
> > > into mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2013-11-11 at 13:25 -0600, Lijun Pan wrote:
> > > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85xx_defconfig already have
> > > CONFIG_P1023RDS=y.
> > > > Merge CONFIG_P1023RDB=y and other relevant configurations into
> > > mpc85xx_smp_defconfig and mpc85_defconfig.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Lijun Pan <Lijun.Pan at freescale.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig  |  188
> > > > --------------------
> > > --------
> > > >  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_defconfig     |   18 +++
> > > >  arch/powerpc/configs/mpc85xx_smp_defconfig |   17 +++
> > > >  3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)  delete mode
> > > > 100644 arch/powerpc/configs/85xx/p1023_defconfig
> > >
> > > Are we still going to want to have one defconfig if and when we
> > > finally get datapath support upstream?  That's a lot of code to add
> > > to the 85xx config just for this one chip.
> > P1023 has dpaa.
> > Will mpc85xx_defconfig or mpc85xx_smp_defconfig support dpaa?
> 
> That's the question I'm asking.  Though I suppose we could take a patch
> like this one for now, and then introduce mpc85xx_dpaa_defconfig when it
> becomes relevant (which would make clear why the defconfig is separate).
> p1023 would still work with the non-dpaa defconfigs, but without dpaa
> support.

It will be hard to find a seat for P1023 in mpc85xx_dpaa_defconfig.
P1023 does not have corenet.  It has e500v2 core. All the  other DPAA SOCs have corenet.
I suggest  leaving p1023 defconfig standalone.
Roy