[PATCH 0/2] move of_find_next_cache_node to DT core
Grant Likely
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
Sun Nov 3 05:06:46 EST 2013
On Fri, 04 Oct 2013 11:42:49 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Grant,
>
> On 18/09/13 17:18, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> > On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com> wrote:
> >>> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha at arm.com>
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures
> >>> apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition
> >>> of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Sudeep
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely at secretlab.ca>
> >>
> >> However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures
> >> yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series..
> >>
> >
> > Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo
> > for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea
> > to combine it as its still initial RFC version.
> >
>
> Do you prefer to have this a independent change or to go with the cache topology
> support patches[1] on ARM ?
Ben's already picked it up, so I'm fine with it.
g.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list