[Suggestion] PowerPC: kernel: cross compiling issue with allmodconfig
Michael Neuling
mikey at neuling.org
Fri Mar 22 10:21:02 EST 2013
Chen Gang F T <chen.gang.flying.transformer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> it seems:
> only move slb_miss_realmode to the end, can fix this issue without negative effect.
So this works but uncovers a new bug.
Stuart: if you apply this patch allmodconfig now gets this build error
on linux-next.
arch/powerpc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `restore_pblist_ptr':
ftrace.c:(.toc+0xd78): undefined reference to `epapr_ev_idle_start'
ftrace.c:(.toc+0xd88): undefined reference to `epapr_ev_idle'
make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
Reverting your patch below fixes this:
commit f070986a07e514e3b4fc4aef6551b8dffcb19287
Author: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder at freescale.com>
Date: Fri Feb 8 13:22:56 2013 -0600
powerpc: Add paravirt idle loop for 64-bit Book-E
Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder at freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org>
Should we revert your patch or can you send a fix? This is currently
broken in linux-next (at least next-20130321).
Mikey
>
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> index 200afa5..56bd923 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S
> @@ -1066,78 +1066,6 @@ unrecov_user_slb:
> #endif /* __DISABLED__ */
>
>
> -/*
> - * r13 points to the PACA, r9 contains the saved CR,
> - * r12 contain the saved SRR1, SRR0 is still ready for return
> - * r3 has the faulting address
> - * r9 - r13 are saved in paca->exslb.
> - * r3 is saved in paca->slb_r3
> - * We assume we aren't going to take any exceptions during this procedure.
> - */
> -_GLOBAL(slb_miss_realmode)
> - mflr r10
> -#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> - mtctr r11
> -#endif
> -
> - stw r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_CCR(r13) /* save CR in exc. frame */
> - std r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_LR(r13) /* save LR */
> -
> - bl .slb_allocate_realmode
> -
> - /* All done -- return from exception. */
> -
> - ld r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_LR(r13)
> - ld r3,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R3(r13)
> - lwz r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_CCR(r13) /* get saved CR */
> -
> - mtlr r10
> -
> - andi. r10,r12,MSR_RI /* check for unrecoverable exception */
> - beq- 2f
> -
> -.machine push
> -.machine "power4"
> - mtcrf 0x80,r9
> - mtcrf 0x01,r9 /* slb_allocate uses cr0 and cr7 */
> -.machine pop
> -
> - RESTORE_PPR_PACA(PACA_EXSLB, r9)
> - ld r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R9(r13)
> - ld r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R10(r13)
> - ld r11,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R11(r13)
> - ld r12,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R12(r13)
> - ld r13,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R13(r13)
> - rfid
> - b . /* prevent speculative execution */
> -
> -2: mfspr r11,SPRN_SRR0
> - ld r10,PACAKBASE(r13)
> - LOAD_HANDLER(r10,unrecov_slb)
> - mtspr SPRN_SRR0,r10
> - ld r10,PACAKMSR(r13)
> - mtspr SPRN_SRR1,r10
> - rfid
> - b .
> -
> -unrecov_slb:
> - EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON(0x4100, PACA_EXSLB)
> - DISABLE_INTS
> - bl .save_nvgprs
> -1: addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> - bl .unrecoverable_exception
> - b 1b
> -
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP
> -power4_fixup_nap:
> - andc r9,r9,r10
> - std r9,TI_LOCAL_FLAGS(r11)
> - ld r10,_LINK(r1) /* make idle task do the */
> - std r10,_NIP(r1) /* equivalent of a blr */
> - blr
> -#endif
> -
> .align 7
> .globl alignment_common
> alignment_common:
> @@ -1336,6 +1264,78 @@ _GLOBAL(opal_mc_secondary_handler)
>
>
> /*
> + * r13 points to the PACA, r9 contains the saved CR,
> + * r12 contain the saved SRR1, SRR0 is still ready for return
> + * r3 has the faulting address
> + * r9 - r13 are saved in paca->exslb.
> + * r3 is saved in paca->slb_r3
> + * We assume we aren't going to take any exceptions during this procedure.
> + */
> +_GLOBAL(slb_miss_realmode)
> + mflr r10
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
> + mtctr r11
> +#endif
> +
> + stw r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_CCR(r13) /* save CR in exc. frame */
> + std r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_LR(r13) /* save LR */
> +
> + bl .slb_allocate_realmode
> +
> + /* All done -- return from exception. */
> +
> + ld r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_LR(r13)
> + ld r3,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R3(r13)
> + lwz r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_CCR(r13) /* get saved CR */
> +
> + mtlr r10
> +
> + andi. r10,r12,MSR_RI /* check for unrecoverable exception */
> + beq- 2f
> +
> +.machine push
> +.machine "power4"
> + mtcrf 0x80,r9
> + mtcrf 0x01,r9 /* slb_allocate uses cr0 and cr7 */
> +.machine pop
> +
> + RESTORE_PPR_PACA(PACA_EXSLB, r9)
> + ld r9,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R9(r13)
> + ld r10,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R10(r13)
> + ld r11,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R11(r13)
> + ld r12,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R12(r13)
> + ld r13,PACA_EXSLB+EX_R13(r13)
> + rfid
> + b . /* prevent speculative execution */
> +
> +2: mfspr r11,SPRN_SRR0
> + ld r10,PACAKBASE(r13)
> + LOAD_HANDLER(r10,unrecov_slb)
> + mtspr SPRN_SRR0,r10
> + ld r10,PACAKMSR(r13)
> + mtspr SPRN_SRR1,r10
> + rfid
> + b .
> +
> +unrecov_slb:
> + EXCEPTION_PROLOG_COMMON(0x4100, PACA_EXSLB)
> + DISABLE_INTS
> + bl .save_nvgprs
> +1: addi r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
> + bl .unrecoverable_exception
> + b 1b
> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP
> +power4_fixup_nap:
> + andc r9,r9,r10
> + std r9,TI_LOCAL_FLAGS(r11)
> + ld r10,_LINK(r1) /* make idle task do the */
> + std r10,_NIP(r1) /* equivalent of a blr */
> + blr
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> * Hash table stuff
> */
> .align 7
>
>
> On 2013年03月21日 13:55, Chen Gang wrote:
> > Hello All:
> >
> > summary:
> > the root cause is no enough room in exception area (0x5500 -- 0x7000).
> >
> > it is caused by the patches "for saving/restre PPR":
> > they consumed much space of this area (0x5500 -- 0x7000).
> > for pseries_defconfig and ppc64_defconfig, it is still ok.
> > but for allmodconfig and "some additional config", it will cause issue.
> >
> > the solving patch "Make room in exception vector area" can make room larger.
> > it can let "some additional config" ok.
> > but for allmodconfig, it is still not enough.
> >
> >
> > details
> > reason:
> > it is caused by:
> > commit number: 13e7a8e846c2ea38a552b986ea49332f965bbb7a
> > commit number: 44e9309f1f357794b7ae93d5f3e3e6f11d2b8a7f
> > they are "for saving/restore PPR"
> > by Haren Myneni <haren at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thu, 6 Dec 2012
> > compiling result:
> > pseries_defconfig: pass (cpu for POWER7)
> > ppc64_defconfig: pass (cpu for POWER7)
> > allmodconfig: failed (cpu for POWER7)
> >
> > analysing:
> > solving patch:
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > commit number: 61383407677aef05928541a00678591abea2d84c
> > Author: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> > Date: Thu Jan 10 17:44:19 2013 +1100
> >
> > powerpc: Make room in exception vector area
> >
> > The FWNMI region is fixed at 0x7000 and the vector are now
> > overflowing that with some configurations. Fix that by moving
> > some hash management code out of that region as it doesn't need
> > to be that close to the call sites (isn't accessed using
> > conditional branches).
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > but for allmodconfig (not only for "some configurations"):
> > it really can reduce much overflow bytes,
> > (maybe from hundreds bytes to dozens bytes)
> > but still not enough (still content overflow bytes)
> >
> > additional trying:
> > after del CONFIG_VSX and CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP in allmodconfig,
> > (will reduce dozens bytes in the region .0x5500 -- .0x7000)
> > it can pass compiling (not overflow).
> >
> >
> > next:
> > I am sorry:
> > I am not quite familiar with the detail features of powerpc.
> > it seems I am not the suitable member to continue trying.
> >
> > I prefer Benjamin to continue trying (just like what he has done).
> >
> > if Benjamin will not do it (e.g. maybe no time to do)
> > I should continue: "make additional room in exception vector area".
> > (if get no reply within a week: before 2013-03-28, I should continue)
> >
> >
> >
> > welcome any members' (especially Benjamin) suggestions or completions.
> >
> > thanks.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> >
> > On 2013年03月15日 13:14, Chen Gang wrote:
> >> 于 2013年03月15日 12:52, Michael Neuling 写道:
> >>> Yep it's a known problem but no one has bothered to fix it since it
> >>> doesn't happen in a config that anyone cares about like
> >>> pseries_defconfig and ppc64_defconfig. We've been moving code around in
> >>> this area a lot recently hence the breakage.
> >>>
> >>> It should be fixed though. Patches welcome. :-)
> >>
> >> thanks, and I should try, and very glad to try.
> >>
> >> :-) :-)
> >>
> >> excuse me, I try to provide related patch within this month (2013-03-31), is it ok ?
> >> the reason is:
> >> I am not familiar with ppc assembly code, neither ppc kernel,
> >> so need additional time resource.
> >> (originally, I worked for x86(_64) core dump analysing for kernel and user programs)
> >>
> >> thanks.
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Chen Gang
>
> Flying Transformer
>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list