[PATCH 3/3] powerpc/fsl: add MPIC timer wakeup support

Scott Wood scottwood at freescale.com
Wed Mar 20 09:54:32 EST 2013


On 03/19/2013 01:25:42 AM, Wang Dongsheng-B40534 wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 8:31 AM
> > To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
> > Cc: Gala Kumar-B11780; linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Wang  
> Dongsheng-
> > B40534; Zhao Chenhui-B35336; Li Yang-R58472
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/fsl: add MPIC timer wakeup support
> >
> > On 03/08/2013 01:38:47 AM, Wang Dongsheng wrote:
> > > +static ssize_t fsl_timer_wakeup_store(struct device *dev,
> > > +				struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > +				const char *buf,
> > > +				size_t count)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct timeval interval;
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	interval.tv_usec = 0;
> > > +	if (kstrtol(buf, 0, &interval.tv_sec))
> > > +		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I don't think the buffer will NUL-terminated...  Ordinarily  
> there'll be
> > an LF terminator, but you can't rely on that (many other sysfs  
> attributes
> > seem to, though...).
> >
> I think we don't need to care about LF terminator.
> The kstrtol--> _kstrtoull has been done.

My point is, what happens if userspace passes in a buffer that has no  
terminator of any sort?  kstrtol will continue reading beyond the end  
of the buffer.

> > > +	mutex_lock(&sysfs_lock);
> > > +
> > > +	if (fsl_wakeup->timer && !interval.tv_sec) {
> > > +		disable_irq_wake(fsl_wakeup->timer->irq);
> > > +		mpic_free_timer(fsl_wakeup->timer);
> > > +		fsl_wakeup->timer = NULL;
> > > +		mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
> > > +
> > > +		return count;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	if (fsl_wakeup->timer) {
> > > +		mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
> > > +		return -EBUSY;
> > > +	}
> >
> > So to change an already-set timer you have to set it to zero and  
> then to
> > what you want?  Why not just do:
> >
> > 	if (fsl_wakeup->timer) {
> > 		disable_irq_wake(...);
> > 		mpic_free_timer(...);
> > 		fsl_wakeup_timer = NULL;
> > 	}
> >
> > 	if (!interval.tv_sec) {
> > 		mutex_unlock(&sysfs_lock);
> > 		return count;
> > 	}
> >
> You can't break up the it.
> if echo zero the code will cancel the timer that is currently running.
> Not echo non-zero value just zero to cancel.

Echoing a nonzero value wouldn't just be to cancel, it would be to set  
a new timer after cancelling the old.

> > > +	for (i = 0; mpic_attributes[i]; i++) {
> > > +		ret = device_create_file(mpic_subsys.dev_root,
> > > +					mpic_attributes[i]);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			goto err2;
> > > +	}
> >
> > Is this code ever going to register more than one?
> >
> No, just one. I only keep the style here.
> If you don't think it's necessary I can remove this loop.

I don't think it's necessary.

-Scott


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list