[PATCH V2] powerpc/85xx: workaround for chips with MSI hardware errata

[Kumar Gala]

On Mar 14, 2013, at 5:35 AM, Jia Hongtao wrote:

> The MPIC version 2.0 has a MSI errata (errata PIC1 of mpc8544), It causes
> that neither MSI nor MSI-X can work fine. This is a workaround to allow
> MSI-X to function properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Liu Shuo <soniccat.liu at gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoli at freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <hongtao.jia at freescale.com>
> ---
> Changes for V2:
> - Address almost all the comments from Michael Ellerman for V1.
>  Here is the link:
>  http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/226833/
> 
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h |  2 ++
> 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c
> index 178c994..54cb83e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c
> @@ -98,8 +98,18 @@ static int fsl_msi_init_allocator(struct fsl_msi *msi_data)
> 
> static int fsl_msi_check_device(struct pci_dev *pdev, int nvec, int type)
> {
> -	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX)
> -		pr_debug("fslmsi: MSI-X untested, trying anyway.\n");
> +	struct fsl_msi *msi;
> +
> +	if (type == PCI_CAP_ID_MSI) {
> +		/*
> +		 * MPIC version 2.0 has erratum PIC1. For now MSI
> +		 * could not work. So check to prevent MSI from
> +		 * being used on the board with this erratum.
> +		 */
> +		list_for_each_entry(msi, &msi_head, list)
> +			if (msi->feature & MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN)
> +				return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> @@ -142,7 +152,17 @@ static void fsl_compose_msi_msg(struct pci_dev *pdev, int hwirq,
> 	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(address);
> 	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(address);
> 
> -	msg->data = hwirq;
> +	/*
> +	 * MPIC version 2.0 has erratum PIC1. It causes
> +	 * that neither MSI nor MSI-X can work fine.
> +	 * This is a workaround to allow MSI-X to function
> +	 * properly. It only works for MSI-X, we prevent
> +	 * MSI on buggy chips in fsl_msi_check_device().
> +	 */
> +	if (msi_data->feature & MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN)
> +		msg->data = __swab32(hwirq);
> +	else
> +		msg->data = hwirq;
> 
> 	pr_debug("%s: allocated srs: %d, ibs: %d\n",
> 		__func__, hwirq / IRQS_PER_MSI_REG, hwirq % IRQS_PER_MSI_REG);
> @@ -361,6 +381,35 @@ static int fsl_msi_setup_hwirq(struct fsl_msi *msi, struct platform_device *dev,
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> +/* MPIC version 2.0 has erratum PIC1 */
> +static int mpic_has_errata(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct device_node *mpic_node;
> +
> +	mpic_node = of_irq_find_parent(dev->dev.of_node);
> +	if (mpic_node) {
> +		u32 *reg_base, brr1 = 0;
> +		/* Get the PIC reg base */
> +		reg_base = of_iomap(mpic_node, 0);
> +		of_node_put(mpic_node);
> +		if (!reg_base) {
> +			dev_err(&dev->dev, "ioremap problem failed.\n");
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Get the mpic version from block revision register 1 */
> +		brr1 = in_be32(reg_base + MPIC_FSL_BRR1);
> +		iounmap(reg_base);
> +		if ((brr1 & MPIC_FSL_BRR1_VER) == 0x0200)
> +			return 1;
> +	} else {
> +		dev_err(&dev->dev, "MSI can't find his parent mpic node.\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct of_device_id fsl_of_msi_ids[];
> static int fsl_of_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> {
> @@ -423,6 +472,16 @@ static int fsl_of_msi_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> 
> 	msi->feature = features->fsl_pic_ip;
> 
> +	if ((features->fsl_pic_ip & FSL_PIC_IP_MASK) == FSL_PIC_IP_MPIC) {
> +		rc = mpic_has_errata(dev);
> +		if (rc > 0) {
> +			msi->feature |= MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN;
> +		} else if (rc < 0) {
> +			err = rc;
> +			goto error_out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> 	/*
> 	 * Remember the phandle, so that we can match with any PCI nodes
> 	 * that have an "fsl,msi" property.
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> index 8225f86..7389e8e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
> #define FSL_PIC_IP_IPIC   0x00000002
> #define FSL_PIC_IP_VMPIC  0x00000003
> 
> +#define MSI_HW_ERRATA_ENDIAN 0x00000010
> +

Is there any reason to put this in fsl_msi.h rather than just in fsl_msi.c itself?

- k

> struct fsl_msi {
> 	struct irq_domain *irqhost;
> 
> -- 
> 1.8.0
>