[PATCH V4] powerpc/85xx: Add machine check handler to fix PCIe erratum on mpc85xx
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Sat Mar 9 11:49:13 EST 2013
On 03/08/2013 02:01:46 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Wood Scott-B07421
> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 12:38 AM
> > To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
> > Cc: David Laight; Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org;
> > Stuart Yoder
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] powerpc/85xx: Add machine check handler to
> fix
> > PCIe erratum on mpc85xx
> >
> > On 03/07/2013 02:06:05 AM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
> > > Here is the ideas from Scott:
> > > "
> > > > + if (is_in_pci_mem_space(addr)) {
> > > > + inst = *(unsigned int *)regs->nip;
> > >
> > > Be careful about taking a fault here. A simple TLB miss should be
> > > safe given that we shouldn't be accessing PCIe in the middle of
> > > exception code, but what if the mapping has gone away (e.g. a
> > > userspace driver had its code munmap()ed or swapped out)? What if
> > > permissions allow execute but not read (not sure if Linux will
> allow
> > > this, but the hardware does)?
> > >
> > > What if it happened in a KVM guest? You can't access guest
> addresses
> > > directly.
> > > "
> >
> > That means you need to be careful about how you read the
> instruction, not
> > that you shouldn't do it at all.
> >
> > -Scott
>
> I agree.
>
> Do you have a more secure way to get the instruction?
> Or what should be done to avoid permission break issue?
probe_kernel_address() should take care of userspace issues. As for
KVM, if you see MSR_GS set, bail out and don't apply the workaround.
Let KVM/QEMU deal with it as it wishes (e.g. reflect to the guest and
let its machine check handler do the skipping). On PR-mode KVM (e.g.
on e500v2-based chips) there is no MSR_GS and it just looks like
userspace code -- for now just pretend it is user mode.
-Scott
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list