[PATCH V2 1/2] powerpc, perf: Ignore separate BHRB privilege state filter request
Anshuman Khandual
khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thu Jun 6 16:04:31 EST 2013
On 06/06/2013 10:26 AM, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Completely ignore BHRB privilege state filter request as we are
>> already configuring that with privilege state filtering attribute
>> for the accompanying PMU event. This would help achieve cleaner
>> user space interaction for BHRB.
>>
>> This patch fixes a situation like this
>>
>> Before patch:-
>> ------------
>> ./perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls
>> Error:
>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 95 (Operation not supported) for event (branch-misses:k).
>> /bin/dmesg may provide additional information.
>> No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured?
>>
>> Here 'perf record' actually copies over ':k' filter request into BHRB
>> privilege state filter config and our previous check in kernel would
>> fail that.
>>
>> After patch:-
>> -------------
>> ./perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls
>> perf perf.data perf.data.old test-mmap-ring
>> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (~102 samples) ]
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <khandual at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c | 12 ++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> index f7d1c4f..3a58416 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
>> @@ -525,16 +525,12 @@ static u64 power8_bhrb_filter_map(u64 branch_sample_type)
>> u64 pmu_bhrb_filter = 0;
>> u64 br_privilege = branch_sample_type & ONLY_PLM;
>>
>> - /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same prvillege state
>> + /* BHRB and regular PMU events share the same privilege state
>> * filter configuration. BHRB is always recorded along with a
>> - * regular PMU event. So privilege state filter criteria for BHRB
>> - * and the companion PMU events has to be the same. As a default
>> - * "perf record" tool sets all privillege bits ON when no filter
>> - * criteria is provided in the command line. So as along as all
>> - * privillege bits are ON or they are OFF, we are good to go.
>> + * regular PMU event. As the privilege state filter is handled
>> + * in the basic PMC configuration of the accompanying regular
>> + * PMU event, we ignore any separate BHRB specific request.
>> */
>> - if ((br_privilege != 7) && (br_privilege != 0))
>> - return -1;
>
> br_privilege is now unused which causes this compile error.
>
> arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c:526:6: error: unused variable ‘br_privilege’ [-Werror=unused-variable]
>
> I assume since you didn't compile test this code, you also didn't
> runtime test it either?!!?!?!?
Always compile with the cross compiler "ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc64-linux-gnu- make"
I copied over arch/powerpc/config/pseries_defconfig and compiled it. Some how it missed
to be a 64 bit kernel config which resulted in shutting down compilation of arch/powerpc/perf/power8-pmu.c
file. So never encountered this compiler warning message before. Will fix this.
Regards
Anshuman
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list