[PATCH 4/4 V2] mmc: esdhc: Add broken timeout quirk for p4/p5 board

[Scott Wood]

On 07/17/2013 05:11:31 AM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> Sometimes command can't be completed within the time give
> in eSDHC_SYSCTL[DTOCV]. So just give the max value 0x14 to
> avoid this issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <haijun.zhang at freescale.com>
> ---
> changes for v2:
> 	- Rebuild patch of eSDHC host need long time to generate
> 	 command interrupt
> 
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c  
> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> index 570bca8..30bfb5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,12 @@ static void esdhc_of_platform_init(struct  
> sdhci_host *host)
> 
>  	if (vvn > VENDOR_V_22)
>  		host->quirks &= ~SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_BUSY_IRQ;
> +
> +	if ((SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_B4860) ||
> +		(SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P5020) ||
> +		(SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P5040) ||
> +		(SVR_SOC_VER(svr) == SVR_P4080))
> +		host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VAL;
>  }

Please don't line up the continuation lines of the if-condition with  
the if-body.

Please check variant SoCs as well.  If the bug exists on p4080, then it  
exists on p4040.  Likewise with p5040/p5021, and p5020/p5010.

Is it present on all revisions of these SoCs?  How about p3041, which  
is usually pretty similar to p5020?  p2040/p2041?  Is there an erratum  
number for this problem?

-Scott