[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: introduce function emulate_math()
Kevin Hao
haokexin at gmail.com
Fri Jul 12 15:36:42 EST 2013
There are two invocations of do_mathemu() in traps.c. And the codes
in these two places are almost the same. Introduce a locale function
to eliminate the duplication. With this change we can also make sure
that in program_check_exception() the PPC_WARN_EMULATED is invoked for
the correctly emulated math instructions.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin at gmail.com>
---
v2:
* Don't depend on the FPU for the PPC_WARN_EMULATED.
* Invoke the PPC_WARN_EMULATED in the caller of do_mathemu().
* Introduce a new function to eliminate the code duplication.
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 58a8065..217724a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -1052,11 +1052,41 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long addr)
return is_kernel_addr(addr);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
+static int emulate_math(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ int ret;
+ extern int do_mathemu(struct pt_regs *regs);
+
+ ret = do_mathemu(regs);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ PPC_WARN_EMULATED(math, regs);
+
+ switch (ret) {
+ case 0:
+ emulate_single_step(regs);
+ return 0;
+ case 1: {
+ int code = 0;
+ code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val);
+ _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip);
+ return 0;
+ }
+ case -EFAULT:
+ _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+#else
+static inline int emulate_math(struct pt_regs *regs) { return -1; }
+#endif
+
void __kprobes program_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
enum ctx_state prev_state = exception_enter();
unsigned int reason = get_reason(regs);
- extern int do_mathemu(struct pt_regs *regs);
/* We can now get here via a FP Unavailable exception if the core
* has no FPU, in that case the reason flags will be 0 */
@@ -1122,7 +1152,6 @@ void __kprobes program_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!arch_irq_disabled_regs(regs))
local_irq_enable();
-#ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
/* (reason & REASON_ILLEGAL) would be the obvious thing here,
* but there seems to be a hardware bug on the 405GP (RevD)
* that means ESR is sometimes set incorrectly - either to
@@ -1131,22 +1160,8 @@ void __kprobes program_check_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
* instruction or only on FP instructions, whether there is a
* pattern to occurrences etc. -dgibson 31/Mar/2003
*/
- switch (do_mathemu(regs)) {
- case 0:
- emulate_single_step(regs);
- goto bail;
- case 1: {
- int code = 0;
- code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val);
- _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip);
- goto bail;
- }
- case -EFAULT:
- _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip);
+ if (!emulate_math(regs))
goto bail;
- }
- /* fall through on any other errors */
-#endif /* CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION */
/* Try to emulate it if we should. */
if (reason & (REASON_ILLEGAL | REASON_PRIVILEGED)) {
@@ -1425,11 +1440,6 @@ void performance_monitor_exception(struct pt_regs *regs)
#ifdef CONFIG_8xx
void SoftwareEmulation(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
- extern int do_mathemu(struct pt_regs *);
-#if defined(CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION)
- int errcode;
-#endif
-
CHECK_FULL_REGS(regs);
if (!user_mode(regs)) {
@@ -1437,31 +1447,10 @@ void SoftwareEmulation(struct pt_regs *regs)
die("Kernel Mode Software FPU Emulation", regs, SIGFPE);
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION
- errcode = do_mathemu(regs);
- if (errcode >= 0)
- PPC_WARN_EMULATED(math, regs);
-
- switch (errcode) {
- case 0:
- emulate_single_step(regs);
- return;
- case 1: {
- int code = 0;
- code = __parse_fpscr(current->thread.fpscr.val);
- _exception(SIGFPE, regs, code, regs->nip);
- return;
- }
- case -EFAULT:
- _exception(SIGSEGV, regs, SEGV_MAPERR, regs->nip);
+ if (!emulate_math(regs))
return;
- default:
- _exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->nip);
- return;
- }
-#else
+
_exception(SIGILL, regs, ILL_ILLOPC, regs->nip);
-#endif
}
#endif /* CONFIG_8xx */
--
1.8.1.4
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list