[PATCH] DTS: Add compatible list for eSDHC

[Zhang Haijun-B42677]

Regards
Haijun.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2013 8:05 AM
> To: Zhang Haijun-B42677
> Cc: galak at kernel.crashing.org; linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Zhang
> Haijun-B42677; Fleming Andy-AFLEMING
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] DTS: Add compatible list for eSDHC
> 
> On 07/01/2013 12:21:50 AM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> > Add compatible of esdhc for below board:
> > p2041   p3041   p4080   p5020   p5040
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <Haijun.Zhang at freescale.com>
> > CC: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
> > CC: Fleming Andrew-AFLEMING <AFLEMING at freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p2041si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p3041si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p4080si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p5020si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> > arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p5040si-post.dtsi | 1 +
> >  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> Is there something specific that depends on this, or are you just trying
> to conform to other examples?
> 
> I don't think we need the SoC name here, given that eSDHC has a version
> register that you can read (and an SVR in the unlikely case that that
> isn't adequate).  If you did end up relying on this device tree change,
> you'd be broken if an older device trees is used.
> 
[Haijun Wrote:] Yes, in mmc driver (sdhci-pltfm.c)some quirks depends on Soc name and its Soc version (sdhci-of-esdhc.c), even if they had the same eSDHC version.

> -Scott