[PATCH v10 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver

[Mark Brown]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 01:56:32PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 08/22/2013 05:40 AM, Nicolin Chen wrote:

> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/spdif-receiver.txt
> > If I understand correctly, this doc for the dummy codec should be invalid?

> Yes, I'm not convinced that binding is a good idea; it describes
> something that often doesn't actually exist in HW. (Sometimes there's a
> real S/PDIF receiving device on board, but sometimes there's nothing
> except a jack/connector).

> It'd be useful if other DT binding maintainers could weigh in on this to
> confirm/deny my thoughts.

I think the binding should be changed to replace the word "dummy" with
"generic" and perhaps some verbiage about not requiring software
configuration.  I think given the unidirectional nature of S/PDIF it's
reasonable to represent a jack like this - the hardware can't generally
tell if there's anything at the other end of the link anyway, for all
pratical purposes the transmit end just has to blindly send.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20130822/00d87cac/attachment.sig>