[PATCH v7 2/2] ASoC: fsl: Add S/PDIF machine driver

[Mark Rutland]

On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 09:35:22AM +0100, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> This patch implements a device-tree-only machine driver for Freescale
> i.MX series Soc. It works with spdif_transmitter/spdif_receiver and
> fsl_spdif.c drivers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <b42378 at freescale.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt  |   29 +++++
>  sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig                              |   11 ++
>  sound/soc/fsl/Makefile                             |    2 +
>  sound/soc/fsl/imx-spdif.c                          |  134 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt
>  create mode 100644 sound/soc/fsl/imx-spdif.c
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..9a3fa26
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/imx-audio-spdif.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +Freescale i.MX audio complex with S/PDIF transceiver
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +  - compatible : "fsl,imx-audio-spdif"
> +
> +  - model : The user-visible name of this sound complex

Is this used semantically, or is it a completely arbitrary string?  In
either case I don't see why the compatible string doesn't give the
driver enough to have a sensible value.

I'm confused as to why we need this. The phrase "user-visible" in a
device description seems very odd.

> +
> +  - spdif-controller : The phandle of the i.MX S/PDIF controller
> +
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +  - spdif-transmitter : The phandle of the spdif-transmitter dummy codec
> +
> +  - spdif-receiver : The phandle of the spdif-receiver dummy codec
> +
> +* Note: At least one of these two properties should be set in the DT binding.

Are all four units (comlpex,controller,transmitter,receiver) really
separate blocks?

Thanks,
Mark.