[PATCH 63/63] powerpc: Add pseries_le_defconfig
Michael Ellerman
michael at ellerman.id.au
Fri Aug 9 13:23:53 EST 2013
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:12:37AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
> Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION disabling should be done in the Kconfig not
> > > here.
> > >
> > > I'm not that keen on another defconfig. benh is already talking about
> > > having a powernv defconfig. I'm worried we are going to fragment the
> > > defconfigs. If you want something special like LE, then change the
> > > default one.
> >
> > I agree we don't want machine specific defconfigs, but I think it makes
> > sense to have ones that cover the key options that conflict. I'm
> > thinking 32bit, 64bit, 64bit BookE, 64bit LE etc.
> >
> > One bonus is if we have a smaller set of defconfigs we might actually
> > get better testing. I have no idea which 32bit defconfigs I should test
> > for example, and I'm not going to test them all!
>
> FWIW, I test with these configs and it seems to catch most of 32/64 bit,
> SMP/UP, differnt MMU issues:
>
> pseries_defconfig
> ppc64_defconfig
> ppc64e_defconfig
> pmac32_defconfig
> ppc44x_defconfig
> ppc6xx_defconfig
> mpc85xx_smp_defconfig
> mpc85xx_defconfig
> chroma_defconfig
> ps3_defconfig
> celleb_defconfig
I think cell_defconfig pretty much covers these too, and also gets you
coverage of the IBM blades.
And add randconfig too :)
cheers
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list