[PATCH] powerpc: fix typo in PTRS_PER_PUD
Scott Wood
scottwood at freescale.com
Thu Sep 13 09:00:09 EST 2012
PTRS_PER_PUD should be based on PUD_INDEX_SIZE, not PMD_INDEX_SIZE. We
got away with it because PUD and PMD had the same index size, but this is
no longer true with Aneesh's patchset to support a 46-bit user effective
address space.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood at freescale.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h
index b3eccf2..12798c9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64-4k.h
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
#define PTRS_PER_PTE (1 << PTE_INDEX_SIZE)
#define PTRS_PER_PMD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
-#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PMD_INDEX_SIZE)
+#define PTRS_PER_PUD (1 << PUD_INDEX_SIZE)
#define PTRS_PER_PGD (1 << PGD_INDEX_SIZE)
/* PMD_SHIFT determines what a second-level page table entry can map */
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list