linux-next: PowerPC boot failures in next-20120521
Stephen Rothwell
sfr at canb.auug.org.au
Tue May 22 13:25:10 EST 2012
On Tue, 22 May 2012 13:03:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 May 2012 18:53:37 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, it's sched/numa since that's what introduced numa_init(). It does
> > for_each_node() for each node and does a kmalloc_node() even though that
> > node may not be online. Slub ends up passing this node to the page
> > allocator through alloc_pages_exact_node(). CONFIG_DEBUG_VM would have
> > caught this and your config confirms its not enabled.
> >
> > sched/numa either needs a memory hotplug notifier or it needs to pass
> > NUMA_NO_NODE for nodes that aren't online. Until we get the former, the
> > following should fix it.
> >
> >
> > sched, numa: Allocate node_queue on any node for offline nodes
> >
> > struct node_queue must be allocated with NUMA_NO_NODE for nodes that are
> > not (yet) online, otherwise the page allocator has a bad zonelist.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com>
>
> Thanks, that fixes it.
>
> Tested-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr at canb.auug.org.au>
And I will put that patch in linux-next until it (or something better)
appears.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr at canb.auug.org.au
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/attachments/20120522/5b10171e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Linuxppc-dev
mailing list