powerpc/85xx: p2020rdb - move the NAND address.

[Sebastian Andrzej Siewior]

On 03/29/2012 03:10 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:

>> - include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h
>>
>> #ifndef CONFIG_NAND_SPL
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE            0xffa00000
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       0xfffa00000ull
>> #else
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
>> #endif
>> #else
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE            0xfff00000
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       0xffff00000ull
>> #else
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
>> #endif
>> #endif
>>
>> - include/configs/p1_p2_rdb_pc.h
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_NAND_FSL_ELBC
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE            0xff800000
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       0xfff800000ull
>> #else
>> #define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE_PHYS       CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE
>> #endif
>>
>
> There are two (well 3 since rdb-pc has both 32b&  36b) in the tree now:
>
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb.dts
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc_32b.dts
> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p2020rdb-pc_36b.dts

Okay. So I assume that one has the proper NAND address and my patch
should be reverted then. Do want a patch from me for that?

>> Since both system have the same SoC and the NAND_SPL is always linked
>> against 0xfff00000 I don't see anything wrong to relocate the NAND CS
>> later to 0xff800000 (or to 0xffa00000) and having it consistent among
>> both configs.

what about this thing? Should leave it as it or move to the same
location? Since I have no HW *I* would prefer not to touch it :)

>
> - k

Sebastian