[PATCH v1 09/11] powerpc/PCI: replace pci_probe_only with pci_flags
olof at lixom.net
Mon Mar 5 14:59:36 EST 2012
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:41:39AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 11:19 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> > int maple_pci_get_legacy_ide_irq(struct pci_dev *pdev, int channel)
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c
>> > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c
>> > index b6a0ec4..b27d886 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pasemi/pci.c
>> > @@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ void __init pas_pci_init(void)
>> > pci_devs_phb_init();
>> > /* Use the common resource allocation mechanism */
>> > - pci_probe_only = 1;
>> > + pci_add_flags(PCI_PROBE_ONLY);
>> > }
>> Olof, do you remember why you used to set that on pasemi ?
> Oops, going through email backlog. Sorry for the slow response.
>> I would have expected it to be clear, so the kernel can re-assign things
>> if needed. We really only want it set for pseries because of the
>> hypervisor being a PITA :-)
> Well, we did have some hypervisor work done at PA Semi too, and chances
> are it's from there. But it's unlikely since I think we booted pseries
> (PAPR) kernels under rHype.
> I suspect we just went with it for whatever legacy reasons and didn't
> revisit later -- since our firmware enumerated busses reliably there
> was no reason to redo it from the kernel.
> I've booted a system with pci_probe_only off here, and it seems happy
> enough. I'll send you a patch.
> Bjorn, that means you can drop this chunk of the patch, I suppose.
Sorry to comment to myself so quickly but since I just noticed that
the patch is in -next, don't worry about rebasing your work -- we'll
take out the flag use later.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev