[PATCH 1/2] atomic: Allow atomic_inc_not_zero to be overridden
akpm at linux-foundation.org
Fri Mar 2 10:02:56 EST 2012
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:09:53 +1100
Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org> wrote:
> We want to implement a ppc64 specific version of atomic_inc_not_zero
> so wrap it in an ifdef to allow it to be overridden.
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton at samba.org>
> Index: linux-build/include/linux/atomic.h
> --- linux-build.orig/include/linux/atomic.h 2012-02-11 14:59:23.284714257 +1100
> +++ linux-build/include/linux/atomic.h 2012-02-11 15:01:14.894764555 +1100
> @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atom
> * Atomically increments @v by 1, so long as @v is non-zero.
> * Returns non-zero if @v was non-zero, and zero otherwise.
> +#ifndef atomic_inc_not_zero
> #define atomic_inc_not_zero(v) atomic_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
Please merge this via the ppc tree?
And let's ask the hexagon maintainers to take a look at the definition
in arch/hexagon/include/asm/atomic.h. I assume that it can be removed,
but that might cause problems with files which include asm/atomic.h
directly. I have found two such files in non-arch code and have queued
fixes. There are no such files in arch/hexagon code, so I think it's
safe to zap the hexagon definition of atomic_inc_not_zero().
> +static __inline__ int atomic_inc_not_zero(atomic_t *v)
Curious: is there a technical reason why ppc uses "__inline__" rather
More information about the Linuxppc-dev