[PATCH 3/3 v2] powerpc/mpic: FSL MPIC error interrupt support.

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Jul 10 11:47:14 EST 2012


On Jul 9, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:

> On 07/09/2012 02:03 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 9, 2012, at 3:47 AM, Varun Sethi wrote:
>> 
>>> +int mpic_err_int_init(struct mpic *mpic, irq_hw_number_t irqnum)
>>> +{
>> 
>> Why can't we do this during mpic_init() time?
> 
> Are you willing to hardcode that IRQ 16 is the error interrupt, without
> waiting to see an intspec?

I'm torn, but the bit of code in mpic_host_xlate that calls mpic_err_int_init() is just ugly.

We could consider it similar to how we assume IPIs.

>>> +	ret = request_irq(virq, fsl_error_int_handler, IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>>> +		    "mpic-error-int", mpic);
>> 
>> Hmm, should we be using irq_set_chained_handler() instead of request_irq
> 
> As I said last time, "that's how Varun initially did it and I asked him
> to change it, because it gets a lot trickier to get things right, and I
> didn't see what it was buying us."  That original patch had locking
> problems as a result.
> 
> Using the chained handler mechanism puts the responsibility on us to do
> a lot of the generic stuff that's already perfectly well implemented in
> generic code.  We're implementing a cascade, not a new flow.

Makes sense.

- k


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list