[RFC PATCH 14/16] KVM: PPC: booke: category E.HV (GS-mode) support

Alexander Graf agraf at suse.de
Thu Jan 12 18:11:11 EST 2012



On 12.01.2012, at 07:44, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:

> On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 04:11 +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> This is what book3s does:
>> 
>>                case EMULATE_FAIL:
>>                        printk(KERN_CRIT "%s: emulation at %lx failed
>> (%08x)\n",
>>                               __func__, kvmppc_get_pc(vcpu),
>> kvmppc_get_last_inst(vcpu));
>>                        kvmppc_core_queue_program(vcpu, flags);
>>                        r = RESUME_GUEST;
>> 
>> which also doesn't throttle the printk, but I think injecting a
>> program fault into the guest is the most sensible thing to do if we
>> don't know what the instruction is supposed to do. Best case we get an
>> oops inside the guest telling us what broke :).
> 
> You can also fallback to a slow path that reads the guest TLB,
> translates then reads the instruction. Of course you have to be careful
> as such a manual translate + read + execute needs to be somewhat
> synchronized with a possible TLB invalidation :-)

Well we do want to be fast on the default path though. So yes, what you're saying is what book3s does, but as a fallback in case the fast path didn't work.

The problem here however is that we don't know if the fast path failed; we oops.


> 
> (MMIO emulation is broken in this regard too btw)

Huh?

Alex

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


More information about the Linuxppc-dev mailing list