[RFC PATCH 16/16] KVM: PPC: e500mc support
avi at redhat.com
Tue Jan 10 19:37:15 EST 2012
On 01/09/2012 09:29 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> > Best to include their signoffs, if possible.
> These patches are based in part on a bunch of different patches from
> these people (for which I did receive signoffs). I was reluctant to put
> their signoff directly on the new patches, since I didn't want to make
> it look like they had submitted the patch in anything resembling its
> current form. I wanted to give them credit for what they did, but not
> blame for what I did with their code.
Signoffs are for assigning neither credit nor blame, but for attributing
authorship and affirming that a contributor has the right to contribute
code or pass it along. Please read the DCO at
It's okay to miss them from time to time, especially for established
contributors, but avoid it whenever possible.
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
More information about the Linuxppc-dev