[PATCH 1/2 v2] powerpc/dts: Add dts for p1025rdb board

[Zang Roy-R61911]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-fei.zang=freescale.com at lists.ozlabs.org
> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+tie-fei.zang=freescale.com at lists.ozlabs.org]
> On Behalf Of Kumar Gala
> Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 7:44 AM
> To: Wood Scott-B07421
> Cc: linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org; Zhicheng Fan; Fan Zhicheng-B32736
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] powerpc/dts: Add dts for p1025rdb board
> 
> 
> On Jan 31, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
> 
> > On 01/31/2012 09:55 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:51 AM, Zhicheng Fan wrote:
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zhicheng Fan <b32736 at freeescale.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-post.dtsi |  228
> +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-pre.dtsi  |   70 +++++++
> >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dts          |  137 +++++++++++++
> >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dtsi         |  286
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb_36b.dts      |   88 ++++++++
> >>> 5 files changed, 809 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-post.dtsi
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/p1025si-pre.dtsi
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dts
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb.dtsi
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1025rdb_36b.dts
> >>
> >> For the p1024 & p1025 I do NOT want to add new dts/fsl/p1025si*.dtsi
> files.  We should use the p1020 and p1021 as they are identical.
> >
> > Are they sufficiently software compatible that we want to use
> > p1020/p1021 in all the compatible strings?  If yes, how was this verified?
> 
> They are the identical silicon just in different physical packages.  It was
> verified by me asking the FSL marketing team.
> 
> I'll work up a patch to add some comments to the p1020 & p1021si dts files
> about being the same for p1024/p1025.
Should we expose the information "p1024/p1025 are identical to p1020/p1021" to our customer?
Thanks.
Roy